Xen Orchestra Backup, Single VM Failing
-
So this is for @olivier I'm at a loss for what is occurring for this failure to happen.
This has occurred regularly with this VM, is there additional logging I can look at to see why this particular VM is failing on the delta backup?
-
Any snapshots on the VM? Have you tried to remove the VM from the job, run it again, then readd it?
-
I have 1 full of this VM, but no delta's.
The other VM's have their full and delta's.
I have not removed it from the job and readded it. I'll give it a try now.
-
Seems to have worked when removing the VM, and re-adding it...
Odd though...
-
Did you turn it off and back on again?
-
I did restart the VM, the issue was persistent.
Removing the VM, running it, and then re-adding it seems to have corrected whatever was wrong.
-
@DustinB3403 I was only joking
-
Next, he'll be telling you to call 0118 999 881 999 119 725...3.
-
This number will give you better looking support team, faster response time and a lot more! So remember, dial 0118 999 881 999 119 725...3!
-
WTF is X OS
-
-
Xen Orchestra Source
-
@anonymous said:
Xen Orchestra Source
I have never seen that acronym used. Did he just make it up
-
XO = Xen Orchestra. There is only one thing that is XO.
There is XOA, but it is still XO. Just XO managed by someone.
So unless you say you use XOA, the assumption would have to be XO not managed by anyone and the only way to get XO if it is not XOA is obviously the source distribution.
Trying to call it XOS is just trying to intentionally confuse things.
Note sorry for the multi part response. I was driving and using Siri earlier.
-
@JaredBusch said:
WTF is X OS
I asked the same thing. There isn't any product with those initials that I can find.
-
@JaredBusch said:
XO = Xen Orchestra. There is only one thing that is XO.
There is XOA, but it is still XO. Just XO managed by someone.
So unless you say you use XOA, the assumption would have to be XO not managed by anyone and the only way to get XO if it is not XOA is obviously the source distribution.
Trying to call it XOS is just trying to intentionally confuse things.
Note sorry for the multi part response. I was driving and using Siri earlier.
I had this exact same conversation with him via IM last night. I said that using XOS was confusing as it doesn't exist as a product name, there is no means to figure out what it implies and no way to look it up. There is nothing called Xen Orchestra Source so even the source of the acronym remains a mystery. He said that he spoke to @olivier and he agreed that XOS was the right acronym, and that it should be used for clarity. But obviously it is exactly the opposite and no one knows what it means, no one searching will EVER find this and will bypass it because XOS is clearly not what someone using XO is looking for (even using XO in the title would be confusing for that, it's not a big enough product to not use its name in titles) so it is basically just hiding the info from everyone. Only the tags give away what product is being talked about.
-
For those wondering, the original title was: XOS Backup single VM Failing
Modding to something searchable and identifiable so that people know what the topic is.
-
As I said on the topic where he's asked:
@olivier said:
For me, it's mainly XO when talking about sources, XOA the appliance. But XOS if you like, it doesn't matter
-
-
But that's easy:
- XO stands for "Xen Orchestra"
- XOA is "Xen Orchestra virtual Appliance"
He thought that XO mean XOA and no term existed for XO itself.
