I wouldn't install Personal use software in a normal company, that's a bad idea and just asking for trouble.

However in my case it's fine. None of the free or personal use software I have is licensed based on where it's installed but based on it's use. It's fairly common for company to even give out NFR/Non-Commercial use software when you do some pro-bono work that could use it.

@Breffni-Potter said:

Still looks good though, if it's a toss-up between shoot it or not, then use 4:2:2. - Very few actually go to the time and painstaking effort of properly grading their work anyway.

Any professional will use LUTs and do the edit then during the post process it gets send to a color house to do the final color work. Coloring is just like special effects they are done by facilities that specialize in that and only do that.

I should also point out that I attempt to do the news posting when there are lulls in the conversation, otherwise, rather than when things are busy. That way if people are looking for something happening they are more likely to find it. I try to use it to even out the traffic flow a tiny bit. Once it a while it prompts conversations at an odd hour.

Not sure how they handle the 1:1 Nat mapping of those IPs at the OS level.. Or I guess they might just add a new Nic for each IP.

Thanks @shannon

@ckhardy said:

I contracted at Fuze for a few months -- The company uses the product for every meeting so it is effectively user-tested daily.

The video definition is high and it handles conferencing with hundreds of individual dial-ins well. Chat is associated with a meeting so that concurrent side conversations can take place without interrupting the speaker. You can set up groups to assign different permission levels to so for example, for a more interactive session, you could create a group with the ability to request the screen and to show video or their desktop.

I would suggest contacting sales and ask for a free trial period. It's been a couple of years since I've used it extensively so I'm sure there are a lot of new features I'm missing

Thanks for that info. I will get in touch with sales.

This isn't something we are going to use everyday so the price looks reasonable.

With so many services starting up, there is a lot of chances for things to have not all fired up yet.

@thecreativeone91 said:

@thanksajdotcom said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@thanksajdotcom said:

Ok, I'd think it'd be a simple thing to add the CentOS 6 repos, run a yum update, and allow the packages to update. What makes it not that simple?

That it does nothing. A CentOS 5 system, pointed to CentOS 6 repos will simply see the as not applying. You can't change your OS version using YUM.

Oh, I was not aware of that.

Maybe you are thinking of Minor release updates, not major release.

Yeah, must be.

I use CrashPlan PRO on a Linux machine to mount my Synology NAS via NFS and offsite my Veeam Backups.

This is a supported method of backing up a NAS.

http://support.code42.com/CrashPlan/Latest/Backup/Mounting_Networked_Storage_Or_NAS_Devices_For_Backup

cp

@Reid-Cooper said:

That's interesting. Quotes without the escapes should make that unnecessary. Interesting way to fix it, though.

Yeah, the quotes was still showing it as a syntax error.

Looks like this is live now...

25 days ago....silly.

Today...totally worth it.

lulz

@IRJ said:

@tonyshowoff said:

@scottalanmiller said:

Tony is the new AJ.

I'm at least 10x sexier than he is.

I'd say so
halfshirtman22.jpg

lol, reminds me a bit of a character Eric Bana used to play called Poida

Haha, alright so I set up the steps today to change the port, create new user, elevate all that (as I'm sure the people who are reading this saw)

Now my error is relating to the changes I made.
I assume the two things can work successfully together?

failed to start.JPG

Im my constant posts on trying to get this going is annoying anyone just lemme know and I'll stop attempting this/asking a million questions haha

@Aaron-Studer

Gone this all done as well thanks for the tip.

@Nic said:

(F moderated) yeah, I use them! 🙂

This censorship is a (f moderated) tragedy.

@Dashrender said:

Sure, Amazon, etc might have very low latency - but they don't control your endpoint, and that is probably just as important if not more so!

Yes, your endpoint is a big deal. But Amazon has very low latency to nearly any carrier. They peer with everyone. So in a way, they almost do. Go ping Amazon and see what your latency is.

I've done this in the past, though without looking it up I couldn't tell you how. 🙂

@Sparkum That's strange, b/c I believe "enabled" is the correct entry.