@technobabble said:

@thanksaj said:

What PC are they connecting to, and are the credentials stored in the browser on that computer somehow? I'm confused how having them remote into a specific PC to do this when they likely need to know the credentials anyways adds any value.

This would be a one time log in and no, the password is not saved.

Ok, so how does having them use a separate PC make anything more secure? Unless they are using personal machines for work...

@Reid-Cooper said:

Maybe Webroot should have a tweet for everytime that it is blocked!

I like it!

Interface is everything isn't it? What's so great about the backend?

One of these days I'll finally get organised with my photos. Maybe....One day......

Yes, VM snapshots. Pain.

@Minion-Queen said:

I have heard that both of these are really good.

Brother MFC-J6720DW $225 on amazon

Set this bad boy up yesterday along HP Pro series desktop. It was nice to see that the product is a Professional Series Inkjet. Much bigger than our previous Brother consumer printers, this one is close to the specs of the 2 we bought.

Thanks for the recommendations!

Also, @PSX_Defector , this is my test box. They let you pick whatever OS you want to run on here and run it, be it Windows or any flavor of Linux. They don't put any blocks on it. I just use Google for DNS because it's faster and more stable as a rule.

@FiyaFly said:

Well, they send the notification as though they are getting a channel unavailable response from the PBX. I'm looking to call them tomorrow but wanted to see if anyone had seen this before. I do not think it is the PBX either.

Everything about this screams "hiccup in Vitelity" but of course, they'll pass it off as a PBX problem unless you can prove definitively otherwise.

This actually has been discussed quite a bit in forums over the last few weeks. And the bug, expanding the virtual disk and CBT affects more than embedded systems. Started, I think, on Reddit, then discussed by Veeam, noticed on The Register, and brought over to SW.

@NetworkNerd said:

So do you direct your users to the site where the RemoteApp gets published to use to connect to it, or do you put a shortcut on their desktops for the RemoteApp as well? I'm assuming there is no difference in functionality but don't really know at this point.

I push a shortcut. You cannot trust users to find anything via direction.

@milnesy said:

@thanksaj Problem is, they're a school district with little, if any, funding for IT. Backups are always an afterthought.

What they need to see is that whatever budget there is, is the budget. Skipping backup planning is like taking the budget and spending it on things they can't afford. It's the business equivalent of knowing you have to pay rent for the month AND pay for food but going out to eat every night and not being able to make rent and then saying "meh, who needs shelter, it's not like the weather ever gets bad."

It's called a budget for a reason. They need to take the money that they have and figure out what they can do with it. If there isn't money for backups, there isn't money for anything. What's really happening is that they blew the budget and hoped that they wouldn't get caught.

Awesome 🙂 I want free stuff too

@scottalanmiller said:

Awesome, though completely ridiculous that simple text files like html and php would mess up your sync program!!

Agreed. I'll repeat my original assertion on the original thread:

@Carnival-Boy said:

..it seems a bit crap and unreliable.

@Hubtech said:

Does anyone have experience with the rocket dishes? Or any other comparable hardware?

I worked for a company that used the old Cisco Areo (sp?) 1400 or some model like that back in 2007 to point to point two sites. Not sure when they originally installed them, but they worked well over about 3 miles.

I have three servers, though two would be fine. I don't have what I understand as a "reliable failover system" or anything close to it, but if one server is down I am in a position to provide a degraded or limited service using the other server(s) which is generally enough to keep users happy and the business ticking over. It's in no way automated or anything like high availability, but it gives me options and in a crisis I like to have as many options as I can. The cost isn't anywhere near double, since you're not doubling up on disks or memory or CPU by spreading the load across two boxes.

@technobabble said:

@thanksaj onboard

Ok, get some screenshots when you can. That'll help us.

Sorry, I'm only using SCCM 2012 R2 but not SCSM

@scottalanmiller said:

@thanksaj said:

Ok, your adapter is still basically USB to HDMI, so a USB graphics adapter.

No, the USB is for power. It is a VGA to HDMI adapter. There is nothing else to do with VGA except send the video signal.

Sounds like an Xorg issue then.

Ok then, waiting for HDMI cable.

Wow.. must be nice to work somewhere someone want's to spend money!

You could do this with wmic as well, but net use is easier.