ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    New Privacy Policy at EverNote

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    evernotesecurity
    17 Posts 7 Posters 2.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • iroalI
      iroal
      last edited by

      After the change with the limits with the Sync devices I migrated from Evernote to Google Keep and Onenote.

      Both are better options that Evernote right now.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • iroalI
        iroal
        last edited by

        I forgot to say..

        Delete the account is really complicate, you need to disable it and then contact with evernote support, but you cannot contact with support because your account is disabled.....

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @iroal
          last edited by

          @iroal said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

          I forgot to say..

          Delete the account is really complicate, you need to disable it and then contact with evernote support, but you cannot contact with support because your account is disabled.....

          I think avoiding Evernote completely sounds like the right way to go here.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Minion QueenM
            Minion Queen
            last edited by

            I backed away long ago from Evernote. OneNote is just so much better.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Minion Queen
              last edited by

              @Minion-Queen said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

              I backed away long ago from Evernote. OneNote is just so much better.

              I never found it very usable, anyway.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NicN
                Nic
                last edited by

                They reversed the decision after the public outcry:
                http://www.pcworld.com/article/3151153/security/evernote-backs-off-from-privacy-policy-changes-says-it-messed-up.html

                BRRABillB scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BRRABillB
                  BRRABill @Nic
                  last edited by

                  @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                  They reversed the decision after the public outcry:
                  http://www.pcworld.com/article/3151153/security/evernote-backs-off-from-privacy-policy-changes-says-it-messed-up.html

                  That was fast.

                  Still seems like a lot of people have migrated anyway...

                  NicN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • NicN
                    Nic @BRRABill
                    last edited by

                    @BRRABill yeah I was surprised, even impressed, with how fast they realized and corrected their mistake. They must have seen an avalanche of cancellations.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Nic
                      last edited by

                      @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                      They reversed the decision after the public outcry:
                      http://www.pcworld.com/article/3151153/security/evernote-backs-off-from-privacy-policy-changes-says-it-messed-up.html

                      It's only so impressive when it is because of public outcry. Of course they reversed it if customers are leaving. They didn't change it because they wanted to have a good product, they did it because they wanted to make money.

                      NicN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • NicN
                        Nic @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller I'm more referring to the bureaucracy and institutional inertia. Even with a huge outcry it usually takes companies a week to respond to major fuckups like this, even if they start the process on day 1.

                        NicN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • NicN
                          Nic @Nic
                          last edited by

                          The only thing I can think of is that they had the retraction ready to go at the time the made the initial change.

                          RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • RojoLocoR
                            RojoLoco @Nic
                            last edited by

                            @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                            The only thing I can think of is that they had the retraction ready to go at the time the made the initial change.

                            If that is the case, that almost makes it worse... like they wanted to see if they could get away with it, but knowing they wouldn't.

                            NicN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • NicN
                              Nic @RojoLoco
                              last edited by

                              @RojoLoco said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                              @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                              The only thing I can think of is that they had the retraction ready to go at the time the made the initial change.

                              If that is the case, that almost makes it worse... like they wanted to see if they could get away with it, but knowing they wouldn't.

                              Stranger things have happened 🙂 The positive possibility is that there were two factions in the company, one wanting the change and the other cautioning about the disaster. The compromise they came to was to float the balloon but have a plan b in place for disaster. The cynical possibility is what you describe; and attitude of "let's see if they buy it but if not here's the retraction".

                              RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • RojoLocoR
                                RojoLoco @Nic
                                last edited by

                                @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                @RojoLoco said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                The only thing I can think of is that they had the retraction ready to go at the time the made the initial change.

                                If that is the case, that almost makes it worse... like they wanted to see if they could get away with it, but knowing they wouldn't.

                                Stranger things have happened 🙂 The positive possibility is that there were two factions in the company, one wanting the change and the other cautioning about the disaster. The compromise they came to was to float the balloon but have a plan b in place for disaster. The cynical possibility is what you describe; and attitude of "let's see if they buy it but if not here's the retraction".

                                I view the world with cynical glasses.

                                travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • travisdh1T
                                  travisdh1 @RojoLoco
                                  last edited by

                                  @RojoLoco said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                  @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                  @RojoLoco said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                  @Nic said in New Privacy Policy at EverNote:

                                  The only thing I can think of is that they had the retraction ready to go at the time the made the initial change.

                                  If that is the case, that almost makes it worse... like they wanted to see if they could get away with it, but knowing they wouldn't.

                                  Stranger things have happened 🙂 The positive possibility is that there were two factions in the company, one wanting the change and the other cautioning about the disaster. The compromise they came to was to float the balloon but have a plan b in place for disaster. The cynical possibility is what you describe; and attitude of "let's see if they buy it but if not here's the retraction".

                                  I view the world with cynical glasses.

                                  No such thing as a coincidence, I agree!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post