ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    112 Posts 16 Posters 8.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      Are the deployment tools that different from update tools?

      The previously listed PDQ Deploy and Chocolately I see being near equally valuable for deployment as for updates.

      And considering both @Ambarishrh and @scottalanmiller posts, updates are much more likely to be needed/used.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AmbarishrhA
        Ambarishrh
        last edited by

        Got some new info, the helpdesk ticketing solution in plan is from SolarWinds web help desk and it includes DameWare Remote Support. Haven't personally used this, but my thinking is if Dameware is available, should i still look at ScreenConnect?

        travisdh1T JaredBuschJ dbeatoD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • travisdh1T
          travisdh1 @Ambarishrh
          last edited by

          @ambarishrh Probably not.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @Ambarishrh
            last edited by

            @ambarishrh not if the other solution does what you need.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • dbeatoD
              dbeato @Ambarishrh
              last edited by

              @ambarishrh said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

              ticketing solution in plan is from SolarWinds web help desk and it includes DameWare Remote Support.

              That's your deal breaker 🙂 Now you have a two in one package.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jmooreJ
                jmoore
                last edited by

                We use DameWare here and it works great. You should like it. Using PDQ for deployment also and we have been happy with it.

                wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • AmbarishrhA
                  Ambarishrh
                  last edited by

                  We have a demo scheduled on wednesday which will cover dameware remote, based in that i should be able to decide

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wrx7mW
                    wrx7m
                    last edited by wrx7m

                    I have used screenconnect for about 2 years. If you need to remote in via an Android device, make sure you test out their app. It leaves a lot to be desired. The mouse control sucked for the majority of my time using it, then several months ago, the mouse functionality just disappeared and didn't work at all. They finally "corrected" it last month(?) and now it just sucks again.

                    I used to use LMI and would constantly remote in to do maintenance from my phone. I dropped them because of their rising prices and security concerns. Now, with screenconnect, I don't even bother because the app is that frustrating.

                    This was on both a Samsung Galaxy Note 4 on KitKat and Marshmallow and my Samsung Galaxy S8+ on Nougat.

                    That being said, if you are just using a laptop or desktop, it is really nice. I am using the hosted version and only had one access issue in April when WebRoot went rogue and it affected their servers.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • wrx7mW
                      wrx7m @jmoore
                      last edited by wrx7m

                      @jmoore said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                      We use DameWare here and it works great. You should like it. Using PDQ for deployment also and we have been happy with it.

                      For internal clients, I use dameware remote. I have had it since version 8 or 9 (12 is current). It works 99.9% of the time but the interface is really dated. Think Windows XP. You can pass-through creds so you don't have to manually login just to connect (once connected you have to login, at least that is the way I have to do it). I can't figure out how to standardize the interface. Some systems I connect to, will have the multi-monitor toolbar floating on some other section of my screen and others will have it integrated. Some will have the session windowed and others with the whole window floating with a floating toolbar.

                      I also use PDQ deploy. I was using the free version for about a year, then I really needed to have some of the functionality of the enterprise version so I finally broke down. It saves an amazing amount of time and once you start building the multiple step deployments, you can really save some time and hassle. I still use a software deployment GPO for things that I want to automatically happen when the system boots and when it has an MSI. But if it is an exe or involves some sort of filecopy or other script, a schedule, several steps that can be automated, I have started using PDQ Deploy.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • wrx7mW
                        wrx7m
                        last edited by wrx7m

                        I didn't see pricing for the Screenconnect/connectwise hosted listed but I have the hosted unattended access for up to 100 machines and one tech for $600 even, per year.

                        DashrenderD JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @wrx7m
                          last edited by

                          @wrx7m said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                          I didn't see pricing for the Screenconnect/connectwise hosted listed but I have the hosted unattended access for up to 100 machines and one tech for $600 even, per year.

                          That seems expensive. But it is hosted.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch @wrx7m
                            last edited by

                            @wrx7m how can you miss their pricing?

                            https://www.screenconnect.com/Pricing

                            wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • wrx7mW
                              wrx7m @JaredBusch
                              last edited by

                              @jaredbusch - I meant on this thread. Not on their site.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • AmbarishrhA
                                Ambarishrh
                                last edited by

                                The demo for SolarWinds web helpdesk rescheduled to next Tuesday and I hope the dameware version that comes with that (Not very sure about that part either, if we need to pay extra for that, I would most probably go with screenconnect!)

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • AmbarishrhA
                                  Ambarishrh
                                  last edited by

                                  So I am at this point leaning towards screenconnect and guess installing it on CentOS would be a better option? Or should i consider a windows server, assuming that it could be tied up with our local AD? Please advise

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Ambarishrh
                                    last edited by

                                    @ambarishrh said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                                    The demo for SolarWinds web helpdesk rescheduled to next Tuesday and I hope the dameware version that comes with that (Not very sure about that part either, if we need to pay extra for that, I would most probably go with screenconnect!)

                                    Avoid SolarWinds!!! OMG stay away!!

                                    https://mangolassi.it/topic/12800/spam-emails-appearing-to-come-from-solarwinds

                                    AmbarishrhA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • AmbarishrhA
                                      Ambarishrh
                                      last edited by

                                      Looking at the installation video, windows installation seems to be pretty easy and i guess i should be taking this route, as moving forward this VM will be managed by our MSP who does not have good Linux management skills

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Ambarishrh
                                        last edited by

                                        @ambarishrh said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                                        So I am at this point leaning towards screenconnect and guess installing it on CentOS would be a better option? Or should i consider a windows server, assuming that it could be tied up with our local AD? Please advise

                                        There is a slight advantage to Windows, but not enough of one to overcome the costs and overhead (e.g. throw the same resources at a Linux box and you get more from it.) We run on CentOS and it is great.

                                        JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Ambarishrh
                                          last edited by

                                          @ambarishrh said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                                          Looking at the installation video, windows installation seems to be pretty easy and i guess i should be taking this route, as moving forward this VM will be managed by our MSP who does not have good Linux management skills

                                          You need to add that to the cost of using an unqualified MSP. If an MSP can't meet your needs, why use them?

                                          AmbarishrhA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • AmbarishrhA
                                            Ambarishrh @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                                            @ambarishrh said in Decision on Remote Support Tool- ScreenConnect:

                                            Looking at the installation video, windows installation seems to be pretty easy and i guess i should be taking this route, as moving forward this VM will be managed by our MSP who does not have good Linux management skills

                                            You need to add that to the cost of using an unqualified MSP. If an MSP can't meet your needs, why use them?

                                            They are doing complete windows environment management. This just came in as a request from me, as there are no good remote support tool currently. I will leave them to manage this on win box, but personally would've gone for CentOS

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 3 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post