ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    compuverdevnashyperconvergedsdskvm
    10 Posts 4 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
      last edited by FATeknollogee

      Anyone using or testing this? http://compuverde.com/products/

      KOOLERK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R3dPand4R
        R3dPand4
        last edited by

        Neither, but some areas of note just from looking at that site briefly:

        "To begin with you need atleast three servers, but the more the better.
        To be able to use as much raw disk as possible it's better to build many nodes rather then less nodes with lot's of storage disk in them."

        "All data is stored in multiple copies and possibly geographically separated locations within the cluster."

        "Start as small as four nodes"

        There are some strangely semi-conflicting statements within the site itself, and seeing the word "possibly" when describing where your data stripes are distributed within the cluster doesn't really fill me with too much confidence. You could always try it in the lab, but I haven't seen or heard of anyone using it in production at this moment in time. Also I'm not sure what your node count is looking like but if you're in the 2-4 range I'd recommend just sticking with what's industry proven.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • KOOLERK
          KOOLER Vendor @FATeknollogee
          last edited by

          @fateknollogee said in Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged:

          Anyone using or testing this? http://compuverde.com/products/

          SDS is a dining concept at best. With all major hypervisors having some built-in preferred virtual SAN tech spending money and time on anything third-party is... Waste of time at best. You have to have a reason. What's your reason? 🙂

          FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • FATeknollogeeF
            FATeknollogee @KOOLER
            last edited by

            @kooler No reason. Just wanted to reach out & see if anyone had this setup.
            Your advice is well taken!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee @KOOLER
              last edited by

              @kooler said in Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged:

              @fateknollogee said in Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged:

              Anyone using or testing this? http://compuverde.com/products/

              SDS is a dining concept at best. With all major hypervisors having some built-in preferred virtual SAN tech spending money and time on anything third-party is... Waste of time at best. You have to have a reason. What's your reason? 🙂

              The Microsoft version of "virtual SAN" isn't what one would call cheap?

              R3dPand4R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • R3dPand4R
                R3dPand4 @FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                @fateknollogee I mean that's depending on your deployment, it's included with 2016 Datacenter....

                scottalanmillerS KOOLERK 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Never heard of this company.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @R3dPand4
                    last edited by

                    @r3dpand4 said in Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged:

                    "Start as small as four nodes"

                    That's a bit much!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @R3dPand4
                      last edited by

                      @r3dpand4 said in Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged:

                      @fateknollogee I mean that's depending on your deployment, it's included with 2016 Datacenter....

                      And some more mature ones are free.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • KOOLERK
                        KOOLER Vendor @R3dPand4
                        last edited by

                        @r3dpand4 said in Compuverde: vNAS or Hyperconverged:

                        @fateknollogee I mean that's depending on your deployment, it's included with 2016 Datacenter....

                        So is Storage Replica and whole bunch of things you aren't going to use if you aren't within hyperconverged setup. VMware with a separate SKU for VSAN got a better idea. ImHO.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post