ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Seeking advice on a Bid/Quote to a client

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Business
    31 Posts 8 Posters 4.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Carnival Boy
      last edited by

      Pretty sure they weren't transferable when they first came out but after a massive hoo-ha Microsoft backed down and changed their policy.

      Not being able to tell what key is associated with what machine is a massive issue for me. I'm sure there's a way of handling this with a bit of organisation, but I've got into a bit of a mess recently.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        When you log into the MS site to re-associate the license, there are no numbers listed. It simply has a list of how ever many licenses you have associated with an activation button next to each one.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          Carnival Boy
          last edited by

          That is correct.

          office.PNG

          However, I think it lists them in reverse chronological order of when you registered them. So providing you keep a list of what you registered and when and on what PC you installed it on, you should be ok (I wasn't that organised). Alternatively, you could register a separate Microsoft account for each card, as I don't think there are any limits on the number of Microsoft accounts you can hold. You could then associate a PC with a specific MS account.

          It's all a right ball-ache though, isn't it?

          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @Carnival Boy
            last edited by

            @Carnival-Boy said:

            That is correct.

            However, I think it lists them in reverse chronological order of when you registered them. So providing you keep a list of what you registered and when and on what PC you installed it on, you should be ok (I wasn't that organised). Alternatively, you could register a separate Microsoft account for each card, as I don't think there are any limits on the number of Microsoft accounts you can hold. You could then associate a PC with a specific MS account.

            It's all a right ball-ache though, isn't it?

            Thanks for the picture - I didn't have ready access to the logon credentials or the URL.

            Yeah - that is a huge pain in the ass. I guess the OP could add an extra hour of billing to managing the documentation of that list during original setup.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              I understand it's a lot more money, but I'd suggest an Open Volume License version or Office 365. I would not even pitch the key cards - clients will almost always take the cheapest way out

              The client has always purchased key cards and knows the cost. So it is less pitching to the client than showing them the options compared to what they will do without me. I did leave off the regular VLSC price. Just talked to the vendor and that is 341 for Office Standard. So $10k.

              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Bill KindleB
                Bill Kindle @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said:

                I have a potential client needing to upgrade from SBS 2003.

                Here is the hardware and then our proposed labor hours. I have not worked one of these up by myself before for a client I have little experience with.

                The CAL's seem a little high. I think I paid a few dollars less using Open Business for my licensing. Have you checked into that?

                Also, what kind of battery backup are you going to be using for this new setup?

                And why WD Greens? I know the enterprise drives are a little more expensive but the performance gain IMHO is worth it when putting them into a Synology NAS.

                DashrenderD scottalanmillerS JaredBuschJ 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @Bill Kindle
                  last edited by

                  @Bill-Kindle said:

                  @JaredBusch said:

                  I have a potential client needing to upgrade from SBS 2003.

                  Here is the hardware and then our proposed labor hours. I have not worked one of these up by myself before for a client I have little experience with.

                  The CAL's seem a little high. I think I paid a few dollars less using Open Business for my licensing. Have you checked into that?

                  Also, what kind of battery backup are you going to be using for this new setup?

                  And why WD Greens? I know the enterprise drives are a little more expensive but the performance gain IMHO is worth it when putting them into a Synology NAS.

                  yes I completely forgot that I was going to mention this - your putting Green drives in a NAS? That's definitely not recommended. You should look at Red drives at least if not Enterprise Near-SAS drives.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender @JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    @JaredBusch said:

                    @Dashrender said:

                    I understand it's a lot more money, but I'd suggest an Open Volume License version or Office 365. I would not even pitch the key cards - clients will almost always take the cheapest way out

                    The client has always purchased key cards and knows the cost. So it is less pitching to the client than showing them the options compared to what they will do without me. I did leave off the regular VLSC price. Just talked to the vendor and that is 341 for Office Standard. So $10k.

                    What version of Office are they moving from? 2003? If that's the case that shows they get a good long life out of those licenses, I'd definitely go with the OV instead because you will more than likely have to deal with reinstalls, and the value spread over 8+ years (yeah I know 2003 came out 11 years ago) the cost is pretty darned low.

                    If they have 2007 or newer, why are you upgrading?

                    FYI, OV will also give you training credits (rather the company) that they can use to train users how to use Office better. Plus you can also use a KMS server to handle licensing, and you get the rights to use use on a desktop and a laptop, and the users also get the ability to purchase office from MS direct for $10/ea (This might be version dependant).

                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Bill Kindle
                      last edited by

                      @Bill-Kindle said:

                      And why WD Greens? I know the enterprise drives are a little more expensive but the performance gain IMHO is worth it when putting them into a Synology NAS.

                      I would very rarely go to enterprise drives, but I would likely go to Red drives. They are the same as Green but the firmware is changed to work better in RAID arrays. Generally the price is within a few dollars. In a solution of this size, the cost difference would be like .001%, I would just do it.

                      Bill KindleB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        yes I completely forgot that I was going to mention this - your putting Green drives in a NAS? That's definitely not recommended. You should look at Red drives at least if not Enterprise Near-SAS drives.

                        It's not horrible, before there were Red drives we used Green in this way and they worked fine. If there is a significant cost difference and you use RAID 1 or RAID 10, Green is perfectly fine. But if the price is close, just opt for Red today, IMHO.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Bill KindleB
                          Bill Kindle @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller The 2TB drives I got were about $180 a piece, but they are quiet, and I get good performance out of them. At the time I was purchasing, the Reds were a little more expensive.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            Just checked Amazon quickly:

                            WD Green 2TB: $80
                            WD Red 2TB: $100

                            Might be worth staying Green. That's a 25% increase.

                            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Bill KindleB
                              Bill Kindle @Minion Queen
                              last edited by

                              @Minion-Queen said:

                              Did you pad your hours by at least 20% clients that have environments like this will have MANY other things to cause some scope creep as well as the "gotchayas".

                              Last major quote I did, I took what I though it would take me and doubled that number. Just told that customer that this particular part of the quote would be seperate and subject to change, which it did, and turned out to be half of the quote because I over-padded 🙂

                              They were happy as they thought they got a helluva deal, I was happy because I was able to do the work in less time than I had planned and still got paid well.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                Carnival Boy @Bill Kindle
                                last edited by

                                @Bill-Kindle said:

                                I was happy because I was able to do the work in less time than I had planned

                                There should be a special word to describe the warm, fuzzy feeling you get when you finish an IT project in less time than you predicted. I just wish I felt it more often.

                                scottalanmillerS ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
                                  last edited by

                                  @Carnival-Boy said:

                                  @Bill-Kindle said:

                                  I was happy because I was able to do the work in less time than I had planned

                                  There should be a special word to describe the warm, fuzzy feeling you get when you finish an IT project in less time than you predicted. I just wish I felt it more often.

                                  There probably is but it is likely a German word that we can't pronounce.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    Something similar to "Schadenfreude"

                                    Bill KindleB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Bill KindleB
                                      Bill Kindle @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      Something similar to "Schadenfreude"

                                      But it wasn't their misfortune, they still paid way less than I could have charged and they let me get some experience I hadn't gotten yet. It benefited both parties.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Bill Kindle
                                        last edited by

                                        @Bill-Kindle said:

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        Something similar to "Schadenfreude"

                                        But it wasn't their misfortune, they still paid way less than I could have charged and they let me get some experience I hadn't gotten yet. It benefited both parties.

                                        I'm just saying a word along those lines.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          A Former User @Carnival Boy
                                          last edited by

                                          @Carnival-Boy said:

                                          @Bill-Kindle said:

                                          I was happy because I was able to do the work in less time than I had planned

                                          There should be a special word to describe the warm, fuzzy feeling you get when you finish an IT project in less time than you predicted. I just wish I felt it more often.

                                          This happens to me all the time... Said no one ever.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            Just checked Amazon quickly:

                                            WD Green 2TB: $80
                                            WD Red 2TB: $100

                                            Might be worth staying Green. That's a 25% increase.

                                            I will double check with the vendor on the drive costs but I do believe it was close to this. That is why I specified Green.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post