ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    To Cable, or Not to Cable

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    networksecuritywifiethernetcablingspiceworks
    54 Posts 13 Posters 6.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • EddieJenningsE
      EddieJennings
      last edited by

      |can|———string———|can|

      I win security!

      dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        StorageNinja Vendor
        last edited by

        I'm pretty sure I got cancer (Wirelessly) reading that article and the responses.

        https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/post/7386903

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @StorageNinja
          last edited by

          @storageninja said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

          I'm pretty sure I got cancer (Wirelessly) reading that article and the responses.

          https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/post/7386903

          I would never had even read it if you had not mentioned how bad it was earlier this morning.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            StorageNinja Vendor @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

            @storageninja said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

            I'm pretty sure I got cancer (Wirelessly) reading that article and the responses.

            https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/post/7386903

            I would never had even read it if you had not mentioned how bad it was earlier this morning.

            It did make me realize that a LOT of people don't understand the OSI layer model, and how security at a higher level can completely mitigate any breach at a lower level.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @StorageNinja
              last edited by

              @storageninja said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

              @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

              @storageninja said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

              I'm pretty sure I got cancer (Wirelessly) reading that article and the responses.

              https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/post/7386903

              I would never had even read it if you had not mentioned how bad it was earlier this morning.

              It did make me realize that a LOT of people don't understand the OSI layer model, and how security at a higher level can completely mitigate any breach at a lower level.

              Yes. I was shocked by the total dependence on media security and the assumption that if you could access the network itself that all was lost. It explains so much about to many other posts, though.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • travisdh1T
                travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller I'm curious, which AP were you thinking of in this video? By the nature of how radio and wifi work, I don't expect any kind of performance after around 15-20 active clients per radio (most AP have a minimum of 2 radios). Yes, keyword is active. You can have thousands of clients per AP radio if most of them aren't doing anything.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                  last edited by

                  @travisdh1 said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                  @scottalanmiller I'm curious, which AP were you thinking of in this video? By the nature of how radio and wifi work, I don't expect any kind of performance after around 15-20 active clients per radio (most AP have a minimum of 2 radios). Yes, keyword is active. You can have thousands of clients per AP radio if most of them aren't doing anything.

                  None in particular. APs are dirt cheap, so you can always add more. I only mentioned around that number per machine. You can have roughly one AP for every user for the cost of Ethernet drops, anyway!

                  travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • travisdh1T
                    travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                    @travisdh1 said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                    @scottalanmiller I'm curious, which AP were you thinking of in this video? By the nature of how radio and wifi work, I don't expect any kind of performance after around 15-20 active clients per radio (most AP have a minimum of 2 radios). Yes, keyword is active. You can have thousands of clients per AP radio if most of them aren't doing anything.

                    None in particular. APs are dirt cheap, so you can always add more. I only mentioned around that number per machine. You can have roughly one AP for every user for the cost of Ethernet drops, anyway!

                    Yep. Or if you're building didn't get structured wiring put in when it was built, it's much cheaper to run a cable to each AP than it is 2 to 4 cables per room! Which is exactly what my plan is for next year just before the Sophos license runs out, and cheaper for more radios (much less APs) than another year of a license.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                      last edited by

                      @travisdh1 said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                      @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                      @travisdh1 said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                      @scottalanmiller I'm curious, which AP were you thinking of in this video? By the nature of how radio and wifi work, I don't expect any kind of performance after around 15-20 active clients per radio (most AP have a minimum of 2 radios). Yes, keyword is active. You can have thousands of clients per AP radio if most of them aren't doing anything.

                      None in particular. APs are dirt cheap, so you can always add more. I only mentioned around that number per machine. You can have roughly one AP for every user for the cost of Ethernet drops, anyway!

                      Yep. Or if you're building didn't get structured wiring put in when it was built, it's much cheaper to run a cable to each AP than it is 2 to 4 cables per room! Which is exactly what my plan is for next year just before the Sophos license runs out, and cheaper for more radios (much less APs) than another year of a license.

                      That's one of the many places where the original article just didn't make sense. Their assumed "wired is free, wireless is expensive" pricing just doesn't hold up. That can be true, if one is already paid for and one isn't, but that's about equally likely to be either one.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        And over the years I've dealt with a lot of companies that had cabling problems and needed cables ripped out of the walls and fixed at great expense. That can get expensive really quickly.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • dbeatoD
                          dbeato
                          last edited by

                          The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                          scottalanmillerS S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @dbeato
                            last edited by

                            @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                            The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                            I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                            dbeatoD travisdh1T dafyreD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • dbeatoD
                              dbeato @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                              @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                              The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                              I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                              Yeah, sorry I missed that 🙂

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @dbeato
                                last edited by

                                @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                                I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                                Yeah, sorry I missed that 🙂

                                LOL, there are lots of infrastructure things I'd not do on wifi. But the original article was pretty much written from an "all IT is the end user" perspective as if there was no tech involved anyway.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • travisdh1T
                                  travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                  @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                  The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                                  I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                                  There's some new wireless about that I wouldn't be afraid to use as interconnects with servers, but it's not wifi. mm wave beamforming and 40Gb/s if I remember right.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • dafyreD
                                    dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                    @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                    The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                                    I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                                    Can't speak to SAN over WiFi, but databases over Wifi will suck big time -- even if your wifi is reliable.

                                    scottalanmillerS EddieJenningsE 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • dafyreD
                                      dafyre @EddieJennings
                                      last edited by

                                      @eddiejennings said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                      |can|———string———|can|

                                      I win security!

                                      *snip, hides scissors*

                                      EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @dafyre
                                        last edited by

                                        @dafyre said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                        @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                        The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                                        I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                                        Can't speak to SAN over WiFi, but databases over Wifi will suck big time -- even if your wifi is reliable.

                                        SAN is even worse.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • EddieJenningsE
                                          EddieJennings @dafyre
                                          last edited by

                                          @dafyre said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                          @eddiejennings said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                          |can|———string———|can|

                                          I win security!

                                          *snip, hides scissors*

                                          Curses! Foiled by the script kiddie who googled how to compromise a yarn-based connection. 😛

                                          </silliness>

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                          • EddieJenningsE
                                            EddieJennings @dafyre
                                            last edited by

                                            @dafyre said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                            @dbeato said in To Cable, or Not to Cable:

                                            The only thing I would not run over wifi is VoIP phones, not because of security but stability on the network.

                                            I'd be hesitant to do SAN or database connections over Wifi, too 🙂

                                            Can't speak to SAN over WiFi, but databases over Wifi will suck big time -- even if your wifi is reliable.

                                            We have an accountant that comes in every payday to do tasks in Sage. It was decreed she will work in X room on a laptop. I made sure I had a cable that would reach the nearest drop. Just imagine talking to the PervasiveSQL Sage database over wifi.

                                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post