ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    centurylinkubiquitibridging
    28 Posts 5 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @CCWTech
      last edited by

      @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

      @jaredbusch said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

      That fact that you even ask this shows that you are severely out of touch with common ISP practices.

      @JaredBusch will this even work with the USG in DMZ mode instead of bridged? If it's in DMZ do I just need to port forward the VPN ports from the Centurylink to the USG?

      I have no idea. The USG is so limited by the UniFi firmware. I only have a single one in the field. I swore never to waste money on another one after that.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch
        last edited by JaredBusch

        It should "just work" but I know that PPPoE has long had various issues on EdgeOS. I doubt it works well on UniFi.

        In theory, you just need the VLAN here, but technically, under the hood in EdgeOS, a PPPoE connection is another interface and I think you set the VLAN there. I would have no idea how to make it work in UniFi.
        0_1539879372764_d3d7edd0-bda9-4077-b76d-238ca896b854-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch
          last edited by

          Yup, in EdgeOS, you set the vif (VLAN) and then set PPPoE inside it..
          Here is a non VLAN PPPoE i have in the field, from Century Link in fact. DSL, not fiber.

          jbusch@durabilt# show interfaces ethernet     
           ethernet eth0 {
               description "Internet (PPPoE)"
               duplex auto
               pppoe 0 {
                   default-route auto
                   firewall {
                       in {
                           name WAN_IN
                       }
                       local {
                           name WAN_LOCAL
                       }
                   }
                   mtu 1492
                   name-server none
                   password <snip>
                   user-id <snip>
               }
               speed auto
           }
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch
            last edited by JaredBusch

            To use that same connection on VLAN 201, it would look like this.

            The entire pppoe block is inside the vif block.

            I just cannot see how the UniFi will handle that, because there is no real specifications in the GUI.

            jbusch@durabilt# show interfaces ethernet     
             ethernet eth0 {
                 vif 201 {
                    description "Internet (PPPoE)"
                    duplex auto
                    pppoe 0 {
                        default-route auto
                        firewall {
                            in {
                                name WAN_IN
                            }
                            local {
                                name WAN_LOCAL
                            }
                        }
                        mtu 1492
                        name-server none
                        password <snip>
                        user-id <snip>
                    }
                 }
                 speed auto
             }
            
            
            CCWTechC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • CCWTechC
              CCWTech @JaredBusch
              last edited by CCWTech

              @jaredbusch Since it's Fiber, do I even need the CenturyLink C2100T?

              @scottalanmiller

              travisdh1T JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • travisdh1T
                travisdh1 @CCWTech
                last edited by

                @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                @jaredbusch Since it's Fiber, do I even need the CenturyLink C2100T?

                @scottalanmiller

                They're probably using one of the point to multipoint protocols, I forget what the standard(s) is called off hand. It's not a normal network fiber connection.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  Why does your gear need to be in bridge mode? In my experience it’s the ISPs router that has to be in bridge mode passing all the traffic directly onto your firewall which is in normal mode.

                  Jared of course will tell me I’m wrong if I am.

                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @dashrender said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                    Why does your gear need to be in bridge mode? In my experience it’s the ISPs router that has to be in bridge mode passing all the traffic directly onto your firewall which is in normal mode.

                    Jared of course will tell me I’m wrong if I am.

                    The C2100T is from the ISP. So you are misunderstanding something here.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @CCWTech
                      last edited by

                      @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                      @jaredbusch Since it's Fiber, do I even need the CenturyLink C2100T?

                      @scottalanmiller

                      That depends on the actual handoff. Is it simply Ethernet? Then no, you don't need it most likely.

                      I did look at your first post agian, and if the WAN side of the C2100T is handling the tagged VLAN on 201, are you sure that the LAN side is tagged still?

                      CCWTechC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • CCWTechC
                        CCWTech @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @jaredbusch said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                        @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                        @jaredbusch Since it's Fiber, do I even need the CenturyLink C2100T?

                        @scottalanmiller

                        That depends on the actual handoff. Is it simply Ethernet? Then no, you don't need it most likely.

                        I did look at your first post agian, and if the WAN side of the C2100T is handling the tagged VLAN on 201, are you sure that the LAN side is tagged still?

                        Pretty sure it's not. I didn't know you had to tag the LAN side. Do I need to tag ports in the switch as well?

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @CCWTech
                          last edited by

                          @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                          @jaredbusch said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                          @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                          @jaredbusch Since it's Fiber, do I even need the CenturyLink C2100T?

                          @scottalanmiller

                          That depends on the actual handoff. Is it simply Ethernet? Then no, you don't need it most likely.

                          I did look at your first post agian, and if the WAN side of the C2100T is handling the tagged VLAN on 201, are you sure that the LAN side is tagged still?

                          Pretty sure it's not. I didn't know you had to tag the LAN side. Do I need to tag ports in the switch as well?

                          My point was depending on what the thing is actually doing to "bridge" the traffic, you may or may not need to have your USG tagged to VLAN 201.

                          The C2100 WAN is certianly tagged 201. But that doe snot mean the LAN port is.

                          CCWTechC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • CCWTechC
                            CCWTech @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @jaredbusch I have tried with the WAN both tagged and untagged but haven't done anything as far as tagging on the LAN side.

                            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @CCWTech
                              last edited by

                              @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                              @jaredbusch I have tried with the WAN both tagged and untagged but haven't done anything as far as tagging on the LAN side.

                              You need be very specific.. WTF are you tlaking about.

                              CCWTechC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • CCWTechC
                                CCWTech @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @jaredbusch Because the device is offline while you are configuring the PPOE on the WAN side, there is a place for VLAN tagging in the UI for the USG. You can put in the username, password and there is a checkbox for VLAN. I have tired it with checking the box for VLAN and putting in 201. I have also tried the PPOE credentials without checking the box for VLAN.

                                JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @CCWTech
                                  last edited by

                                  @ccwtech said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                                  @jaredbusch Because the device is offline while you are configuring the PPOE on the WAN side, there is a place for VLAN tagging in the UI for the USG. You can put in the username, password and there is a checkbox for VLAN. I have tired it with checking the box for VLAN and putting in 201. I have also tried the PPOE credentials without checking the box for VLAN.

                                  See this is why I said that.. Nothing I was jsut talking about has jack shit to do with the USG.

                                  I was exclusively discussing the C2100T

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    Factory reset seems to have been needed.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      That and removing the silly "modem" from the chain. It's direct now.

                                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Ubiquity USG 3 Port with Centurylink Tecnicolor C-2100t:

                                        That and removing the silly "modem" from the chain. It's direct now.

                                        I asked that and didn’t get an answer.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • 1
                                        • 2
                                        • 1 / 2
                                        • First post
                                          Last post