ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    How many vCPUs can I have?

    IT Discussion
    hyper-v hyper-v 2016 vcpu virtualization hypervisor
    13
    46
    3.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JoelJ
      Joel
      last edited by scottalanmiller

      Hi all

      We’d like to deploy a new server,
      The host has an Intel Xeon Silver 4114 processor. I believe this has 10Cores.

      We have 4x VMs running. All various requirements. Ie. One file server, one sqlserver, one application server and one DC. We’d like to allocate our vCPU’s accordingly and for now have it set as:

      DC- 1
      FS - 2
      APP - 3
      SQL - 4

      The App and SQL run applications that are relatively heavy on resources. RAM doesn’t have an issue as we have 120GB spread appropriately so each VM has enough. however CPU on our App01 and SQL can be high.

      I was wondering based on the server processor our host has, how many Virtual Processors can we use?

      Thanks

      scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403
        last edited by

        Technically you can over allocate resources to your VM's assuming your hypervisor supports it. Up to something like 200% in some cases of the number of cores you have.

        What hypervisor are you using?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          You can have SO many more than are useful. The question you are asking has a theoretical maximum, but beyond wondering what that is, it's not something you want to know. You should be asking how many you should have, not how many you can have.

          It's like asking how much chocolate a human can eat before dying, rather than wondering if you can eat as much as would still taste good.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Remember, giving extra vCPUs that aren't needed lowers performance. You started by saying that you have heavy resource users. Then you finish by asking a question that implies you are looking to kill performance. That's why we are worried.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              How many vCPU you can have is a factor solely of your hypervisor, which you didn't mention.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • dafyreD
                dafyre
                last edited by

                When setting up a VM, I actually start with 1 vCPU... If the system performs well in testing, then move it to production with 1vCPU... If it doesn't, then I'll move on up to 2 vCPUs and repeat the testing...

                The reason is that when you have a VM with more than 1 vCPU, the system has to wait for that same number of cores to be ready to process instructions...

                IE: With your SQL Server, you have 4 vCPUs... The Hypervisor/host has to wait until it has 4 Cores waiting on instructions before it gives any time to your SQL server.

                Generally speaking that's not going to hurt things until your host gets busy with other VMs too.

                scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Joel
                  last edited by

                  @Joel said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                  Intel Xeon Silver 4114

                  This is a 20 thread processor. You've only allocated half of it. Half of the CPU will be completely idle as it is inaccessible in the current configuration.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @dafyre
                    last edited by

                    @dafyre said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                    When setting up a VM, I actually start with 1 vCPU... If the system performs well in testing, then move it to production with 1vCPU... If it doesn't, then I'll move on up to 2 vCPUs and repeat the testing...

                    This is important. This is how performance testing has to be done.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @dafyre
                      last edited by

                      @dafyre said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                      The reason is that when you have a VM with more than 1 vCPU, the system has to wait for that same number of cores to be ready to process instructions...

                      This is why using something like 18 out of the 20 threads would make sense. Hold two back for the system, and the rest just let go idle.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • PhlipElderP
                        PhlipElder
                        last edited by PhlipElder

                        I suggest always setting a minimum of 2 vCPUs to allow access in case of a runaway thread within the guest.

                        When it comes to performance there are two boundaries to keep in mind:
                        1: Processor Physical Core Count
                        2: Memory per memory controller (NUMA Node)

                        Our rule of thumb for #1 is # physical cores (pCores) -1

                        Our rule of thumb for #2 is a bit more flexible as a VM may not start if too much vRAM is assigned and it is bound by a NUMA boundary.

                        A performance hit can be had by too many vCPUs and vRAM assigned that crosses NUMA boundaries (can be set in the VM's properties). In both cases, bits are bounced around either between physical CPUs or between memory banks within each NUMA node. That bouncing around is lost CPU cycles right there.

                        scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @PhlipElder
                          last edited by

                          @PhlipElder said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                          When it comes to performance there are two boundaries to keep in mind:
                          1: Processor Physical Core Count

                          Our rule of thumb for #1 is # physical cores (pCores) -1

                          This should be by thread, not core count. In the AMD world, they are one and the same. In the Intel world, they are not, but are close. In the Power, ARM, and Sparc worlds, they can be wildly divergent.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @PhlipElder
                            last edited by

                            @PhlipElder said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                            Our rule of thumb for #2 is a bit more flexible as a VM may not start if too much vRAM is assigned and it is bound by a NUMA boundary.

                            A performance hit can be had by too many vCPUs and vRAM assigned that crosses NUMA boundaries (can be set in the VM's properties). In both cases, bits are bounced around either between physical CPUs or between memory banks within each NUMA node. That bouncing around is lost CPU cycles right there.

                            With good awareness you can manage this pretty well by mapping out possible RAM bank overruns, or just using NUMA affinity. But that becomes more complex.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              NUMA issues is a key reason why we often recommend a single proc with more cores than two procs with fewer cores each. No NUMA.

                              PhlipElderP travisdh1T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • PhlipElderP
                                PhlipElder @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                                NUMA issues is a key reason why we often recommend a single proc with more cores than two procs with fewer cores each. No NUMA.

                                Don't some of the modern CPUs have multiple memory controllers per CPU thus multiple NUMA Nodes per CPU? I've seen drawings for such but not encountered in servers as of yet.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @PhlipElder
                                  last edited by

                                  @PhlipElder said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                                  NUMA issues is a key reason why we often recommend a single proc with more cores than two procs with fewer cores each. No NUMA.

                                  Don't some of the modern CPUs have multiple memory controllers per CPU thus multiple NUMA Nodes per CPU? I've seen drawings for such but not encountered in servers as of yet.

                                  They might, I've not seen it yet either.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • MattSpellerM
                                    MattSpeller
                                    last edited by

                                    TL;DR 20

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @MattSpeller
                                      last edited by

                                      @MattSpeller said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                                      TL;DR 20

                                      You CAN have way more than that.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ObsolesceO
                                        Obsolesce
                                        last edited by Obsolesce

                                        The maximum you CAN have is 240 vCPUs per VM, which is a limitation of Hyper-V Server 2016.

                                        ObsolesceO scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • ObsolesceO
                                          Obsolesce @Obsolesce
                                          last edited by

                                          @Obsolesce said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                                          The maximum you CAN have is 240 vCPUs per VM, which is a limitation of Hyper-V Server 2016.

                                          That said, Hyper-V will tell you that the percent of total system CPU resources given to a VM will be 100% if you allocate the same number of total threads you have to a VM.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                            last edited by

                                            @Obsolesce said in How many VCPU’s can I have?:

                                            The maximum you CAN have is 240 vCPUs per VM, which is a limitation of Hyper-V Server 2016.

                                            How did you determine that Hyper-V is involved?

                                            ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post