ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    So this is a thing now

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    39 Posts 9 Posters 8.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @coliver
      last edited by

      @coliver Exactly. There is no excusable scenario here.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • coliverC
        coliver
        last edited by

        Not to mention... Lenovo has a fairly big market share even on the consumer side... if they didn't know that consumers hate ads then their marketing and research team failed... hard.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Yes, the adware alone was bad. Very bad. Trying to force ads onto a product that someone bought isn't okay. No one agreed to having their OS modified at the network level to have ads forced on them.

          Then to break security and put people at risk for Lenovo's personal gain... even if they only intended to screw their customer and never intended to do anything worse, there is no way I will ever cross the line to touching Lenovo again.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Don't jump to conspiracy theories. This is very simple. Lenovo had a chance to make money and they simply don't care that they are breaking the law or putting customers at risk. Most customers will assume that it was a mistake and forgive them or, at best, forget because people don't remember these things for long. Lenovo isn't out to hurt anyone, that's not their goal. They want money and they just don't care if their customers are hurt or put at risk while they do it.

            This is hardly the first vendor we've dealt with that is willing to knowingly steal data or put customers at risk to make a buck.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • NicN
              Nic
              last edited by

              Yeah, it's pretty inexcusable, and their official post is mealy-mouthed PR crap. Here's a site that will check for the Superfish cert, if you need it:
              https://filippo.io/Badfish/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • MattSpellerM
                MattSpeller
                last edited by

                I feel like we should all buy a lenovo right now to get in on the sweet lawsuit money 😀

                coliverC IRJI 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • coliverC
                  coliver @MattSpeller
                  last edited by

                  @MattSpeller said:

                  I feel like we should all buy a lenovo right now to get in on the sweet lawsuit money 😀

                  sweet, sweet lawsuit money. Just make sure it was shipped between october and december of last year.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • IRJI
                    IRJ @MattSpeller
                    last edited by

                    @MattSpeller said:

                    I feel like we should all buy a lenovo right now to get in on the sweet lawsuit money 😀

                    Congratulations End Users, You get $7.45 for all the trouble Lenovo has caused you.

                    MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • MattSpellerM
                      MattSpeller @IRJ
                      last edited by

                      @IRJ said:

                      Congratulations End Users, You get $7.45 for all the trouble Lenovo has caused you.

                      See! It is all a scam to get us to purchase more lenovos! /s /tinfoilhattery

                      IRJI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • IRJI
                        IRJ @MattSpeller
                        last edited by

                        @MattSpeller said:

                        @IRJ said:

                        Congratulations End Users, You get $7.45 for all the trouble Lenovo has caused you.

                        See! It is all a scam to get us to purchase more lenovos! /s /tinfoilhattery

                        Make that a $7.45 Lenovo gift card 😛

                        MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • MattSpellerM
                          MattSpeller @IRJ
                          last edited by MattSpeller

                          @IRJ AHAHAHahahahaha - so true!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • thanksajdotcomT
                            thanksajdotcom
                            last edited by

                            Nuke it from orbit!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              BBC labels it spyware....

                              http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-31533028

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                Our own @cakeis_not_alie gets screencapped on Mashable on this very issue!! Congrats!!

                                http://mashable.com/2015/02/20/lenovo-apology-superfish/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • coliverC
                                  coliver
                                  last edited by coliver

                                  Superfish, on the other hand, maintains that it has been "completely transparent in what our software does and at no time were consumers vulnerable."

                                  From the bottom of the article... What? How is breaking the fundamentals of a security protocol designed to keep consumers safe not creating a significant and easily exploitable vulnerability? The more and more I read about this the more and more aggravated I get.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @coliver
                                    last edited by

                                    @coliver ditto, it's not just that they did it, but their attitude after having been caught doing it.

                                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • coliverC
                                      coliver @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller As one of the comments on the link mentioned. What about the other clients of Superfish? Are they as open about the software on their machines as Lenovo was/has been? Who else is sneaking this obvious malware on devices with the users unaware of it?

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • NicN
                                        Nic
                                        last edited by

                                        Their incompetence on this issue is worse than malicious. If they were malicious then they'd at least have protected anyone else from exploiting their cert. And Komodia would have chosen a password that wasn't the name of the company.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @coliver
                                          last edited by

                                          @coliver said:

                                          @scottalanmiller As one of the comments on the link mentioned. What about the other clients of Superfish? Are they as open about the software on their machines as Lenovo was/has been? Who else is sneaking this obvious malware on devices with the users unaware of it?

                                          Excellent question. At least, I suspect, that AV vendors will be looking for Superfish now and hopefully have it categorized as malware so that people are detecting it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • NicN
                                            Nic
                                            last edited by

                                            Also Lenovo has essentially admitted that they have no validation process no the bundleware they install. As long as someone pays them some money, they'll put anything on there. Lizard Squad might as well pay them to automatically add all Lenovo laptops to their botnet.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post