ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Issue with an ERL behind a CradlePoint MBR1400

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    edgemaxcradlepointubiquiti
    15 Posts 5 Posters 3.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thanksajdotcomT
      thanksajdotcom
      last edited by

      Ok, never mind. No WAN port. Looked it up.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thanksajdotcomT
        thanksajdotcom
        last edited by

        Not sure if I'm misunderstanding something, but I noticed a discrepancy in your post on Ubiquiti's site. In the interface list in the GUI, eth0's IP ends in .52 but at the CLI it shows it as ending in .53. Is this how it's supposed to be?

        ubnt@ubnt:~$ show dhcp client leases 
        interface  : eth0
        ip address : 166.130.116.53     [Active]
        subnet mask: 255.255.255.252
        domain name: local.tld  [overridden by domain-name set using CLI]
        router     : 166.130.116.54
        name server: 166.216.138.41 166.216.138.42
        dhcp server: 166.130.116.54
        lease time : 43200
        last update: Fri Apr 17 15:12:07 UTC 2015
        expiry     : Sat Apr 18 03:12:00 UTC 2015
        reason     : BOUND
        
        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @thanksajdotcom
          last edited by A Former User

          @thanksajdotcom said:

          Not sure if I'm misunderstanding something, but I noticed a discrepancy in your post on Ubiquiti's site. In the interface list in the GUI, eth0's IP ends in .52 but at the CLI it shows it as ending in .53. Is this how it's supposed to be?

          eth0 is DHCP assigned from his configuration.

          thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • thanksajdotcomT
            thanksajdotcom @A Former User
            last edited by

            @thecreativeone91 said:

            @thanksajdotcom said:

            Not sure if I'm misunderstanding something, but I noticed a discrepancy in your post on Ubiquiti's site. In the interface list in the GUI, eth0's IP ends in .52 but at the CLI it shows it as ending in .53. Is this how it's supposed to be?

            eth0 is DHCP assigned from his configuration.

            That's why I'm wondering where the discrepancy comes from.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • thanksajdotcomT
              thanksajdotcom
              last edited by

              Never mind. I just did the math. The .52/30 is the network address. .53 and .54 would fall inside that subnet.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User
                last edited by

                Have you tried hard setting the duplex & speeds and also maybe try a cross-over cable between them.

                thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • thanksajdotcomT
                  thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  Have you tried hard setting the duplex & speeds and also maybe try a cross-over cable between them.

                  Most modern networking devices don't care about the pattern of the wires, as long as it's consistent. They can make almost anything work.

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                  • ?
                    A Former User @thanksajdotcom
                    last edited by

                    @thanksajdotcom said:

                    Most modern networking devices don't care about the pattern of the wires, as long as it's consistent. They can make almost anything work.

                    Auto MDI-X and Auto negotiation doesn't always work which is where you can see odd problems like this.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      Picked this back up tonight. new information in the UBNT forum, but looking at MTU issues now.

                      Trying one more setting then calling it a night.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by A Former User

                        I have to change my mtu to 1350 I think on 3G. I've seen TCP Window scaling cause similar issues as well (and along with) MTU issues, But I would hope never devices would have issues with it as they both seem to be new enough.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post