ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Synology crashed disk this morning

    IT Discussion
    8
    24
    3.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403 @stacksofplates
      last edited by

      @stacksofplates said in Synology crashed disk this morning:

      @DustinB3403 said in Synology crashed disk this morning:

      A single drive would be safer compared to RAID0, because with RAID0 if a drive does go, you lose all of the data stored on that drive.

      Guessing that this is a 2-drive unit you have what 8TB max in this unit (2x4TB raid0)?

      Just purchase a single 8TB drive.

      A single drive is not safer because if the drive goes you still lose all of the data on that drive.

      With a single drive, you have a lower chance of failure (raid controllers, drive issues whatever) And a single drive is easily copied from for backup purposes.

      You get an equal size drive, and robocopy or DD all of the data.

      Backup done.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stacksofplatesS
        stacksofplates @brianlittlejohn
        last edited by

        @brianlittlejohn said in Synology crashed disk this morning:

        @stacksofplates said in Synology crashed disk this morning:

        @DustinB3403 said in Synology crashed disk this morning:

        A single drive would be safer compared to RAID0, because with RAID0 if a drive does go, you lose all of the data stored on that drive.

        Guessing that this is a 2-drive unit you have what 8TB max in this unit (2x4TB raid0)?

        Just purchase a single 8TB drive.

        A single drive is not safer because if the drive goes you still lose all of the data on that drive.

        It is because in raid 0 any one of the drives die you lose all the data... 2 drive raid, twice as likely for a failure.

        Ah ya fair enough. I was just thinking you still only need to lose one either way. It's been a long day.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • guyinpvG
          guyinpv
          last edited by

          Turns out neither of the two drives have a reported bad sector in SMART. The only thing I can see is that disk 2 has SMART value "current_pending_sector" of 1. Apparently this means there was a write or read issue and it will be marked the next time it attempts to be accessed.

          As far as I've researched, having 1 pending sector issue is nothing to worry about.

          I just wonder why it didn't handle it automatically and further, wonder if it's striping that somehow prevented it from auto-fixed the sector. I may just have to use these drives separately and skip the striping.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @guyinpv
            last edited by

            @guyinpv i would agree. Nothing to worry about.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • 1
            • 2
            • 2 / 2
            • First post
              Last post