Decent budget NAS
-
@irj yeah that should be fine but what happens if the house burns down.
It's all about risk etc. But I would be happy with just raid1
-
https://www.asustor.com/product/AS1002T?p_id=42
Have full info about it and use it for work for 1 year.
-
I concur with ReadyNAS or Synology recommendations. Buffalo Terastations have been hit and miss, not sure that I trust it any longer.
-
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
I concur with ReadyNAS or Synology recommendations. Buffalo Terastations have been hit and miss, not sure that I trust it any longer.
I've heard mixed reviews about Buffalo terrastations which is why I asked.
-
@irj said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
I concur with ReadyNAS or Synology recommendations. Buffalo Terastations have been hit and miss, not sure that I trust it any longer.
I've heard mixed reviews about Buffalo terrastations which is why I asked.
It is always hit and miss.
-
If you want to lower risk, look at the Synology-based IOsafe devices. Able to live through a fire and flood. Still just a Synology, but like a Synology is a fire proof safe.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
If you want to lower risk, look at the Synology-based IOsafe devices. Able to live through a fire and flood. Still just a Synology, but like a Synology is a fire proof safe.
Definitely out of the consumer price range for any RAID 1 NAS, although I find it odd that they have iosafe Solo units. I would think the risk of a hard drive failing is much more likely than fire or flooding.
-
@irj said in Decent budget NAS:
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
If you want to lower risk, look at the Synology-based IOsafe devices. Able to live through a fire and flood. Still just a Synology, but like a Synology is a fire proof safe.
Definitely out of the consumer price range for any RAID 1 NAS, although I find it odd that they have iosafe Solo units. I would think the risk of a hard drive failing is much more likely than fire or flooding.
Sure, but perhaps it's a sync'ed NAS...
so you can wind up with a situation where you're more worried about fire than disk failure. -
@dashrender said in Decent budget NAS:
@irj said in Decent budget NAS:
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
If you want to lower risk, look at the Synology-based IOsafe devices. Able to live through a fire and flood. Still just a Synology, but like a Synology is a fire proof safe.
Definitely out of the consumer price range for any RAID 1 NAS, although I find it odd that they have iosafe Solo units. I would think the risk of a hard drive failing is much more likely than fire or flooding.
Sure, but perhaps it's a sync'ed NAS...
so you can wind up with a situation where you're more worried about fire than disk failure.IE: If you work at or near Samsung battery factories, ha ha.
-
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
-
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
pun intended :person_climbing_medium-dark_skin_tone:
-
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
pun intended :person_climbing_medium-dark_skin_tone:
I don't see it, what was the pun?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
pun intended :person_climbing_medium-dark_skin_tone:
I don't see it, what was the pun?
The WD MyCloud vulnerability that's why I thought so.
https://mangolassi.it/topic/16037/wd-my-cloud-backdoor/11 -
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
pun intended :person_climbing_medium-dark_skin_tone:
I don't see it, what was the pun?
The WD MyCloud vulnerability that's why I thought so.
https://mangolassi.it/topic/16037/wd-my-cloud-backdoor/11That's not a pun, though.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
pun intended :person_climbing_medium-dark_skin_tone:
I don't see it, what was the pun?
The WD MyCloud vulnerability that's why I thought so.
https://mangolassi.it/topic/16037/wd-my-cloud-backdoor/11That's not a pun, though.
Then it was a bad use of the phrase, I thought pun intended had the meaning of a joke. Again I am really bad with idioms.
-
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@scottalanmiller said in Decent budget NAS:
@dbeato said in Decent budget NAS:
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
pun intended :person_climbing_medium-dark_skin_tone:
I don't see it, what was the pun?
The WD MyCloud vulnerability that's why I thought so.
https://mangolassi.it/topic/16037/wd-my-cloud-backdoor/11That's not a pun, though.
Then it was a bad use of the phrase, I thought pun intended had the meaning of a joke. Again I am really bad with idioms.
Pun refers to a specific kind of linguistic joke where you have one word with two meanings, or rhyming words with two meanings. You need a rhyme or a homonym to have a pun.
For example... Most people think that these kinds of jokes aren't punny.
See how "punny" rhymes with "funny?" That's what makes it a pun, rather than a generic joke. And also what makes it generally not very funny. lol
-
@stacksofplates said in Decent budget NAS:
WD MyCloud. I hear they're easy to remote support.
lol - yeah I was reading this as being nothing more than poking fun at WD, and assumed there must be some kind of remote vulnerabilities in them.
