ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Testing oVirt...

    IT Discussion
    ovirt supermicro red hat virtualization kvm gluster hyperconverged centos7
    21
    339
    52.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      Francesco Provino
      last edited by

      Any real advantage vs plain KVM?

      black3dynamiteB FATeknollogeeF Emad RE 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • black3dynamiteB
        black3dynamite @Francesco Provino
        last edited by black3dynamite

        @francesco-provino said in Testing oVirt...:

        Any real advantage vs plain KVM?

        oVirt is more in line with RHEV. If all you want to do is run VMs, a plain KVM setup is a simple.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • FATeknollogeeF
          FATeknollogee @Francesco Provino
          last edited by FATeknollogee

          @francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!

          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • Emad RE
            Emad R @FATeknollogee
            last edited by

            @fateknollogee

            Very good more pics and stuff please, did you face any hosts disconnections I faced that alot

            FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stacksofplatesS
              stacksofplates @FATeknollogee
              last edited by

              @fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:

              @francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!

              That's what I was wondering. I didn't know if it was a self hosted engine (couldn't think of the name last night) or multiple node setup.

              FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FATeknollogeeF
                FATeknollogee @stacksofplates
                last edited by

                @stacksofplates said in Testing oVirt...:

                @fateknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:

                @francesco-provino This is a 3 + 1 node hyperconverged cluster with Gluster, HA, Live Migration etc!

                That's what I was wondering. I didn't know if it was a self hosted engine (couldn't think of the name last night) or multiple node setup.

                This setup uses the Hosted Engine.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • FATeknollogeeF
                  FATeknollogee @Emad R
                  last edited by

                  @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

                  @fateknollogee

                  Very good more pics and stuff please, did you face any hosts disconnections I faced that alot

                  No host disconnections at all.
                  The current version (4.2.5) is very easy to setup.
                  I will post some pics of an upcoming version, oVirt Node (4.3) based on Fedora 28.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee
                    last edited by

                    oVirt Node v4.3 (based on Fedora 28) - this is pre-release:

                    0_1533637604798_gluster_deployment.png

                    0_1533637615089_step2_fqdns.png

                    0_1533637623806_step3_packages.png

                    0_1533637637986_step4_volumes.png

                    0_1533637646286_step5_bricks.png

                    0_1533637654853_step5_bricks_2.png

                    0_1533637662108_step6_review.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      So you're saying ovirt is pushing the Xen guys to get into gear as this appears to be the entire package, with FOSS.

                      FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FATeknollogeeF
                        FATeknollogee @DustinB3403
                        last edited by FATeknollogee

                        @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                        So you're saying ovirt is pushing the Xen guys to get into gear as this appears to be the entire package, with FOSS.

                        I believe oVirt is being billed as "vSphere for FOSS"

                        You're probably not going to move the Xen/XS/XCP-ng guys off their spot.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dafyreD
                          dafyre
                          last edited by

                          Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                          ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                          DustinB3403D FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @dafyre
                            last edited by

                            @dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:

                            Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                            ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                            I tried setting up oVirt a few versions ago and from what I could find, it's almost expected you have a minimum of 3 physical hosts for it.

                            So no, you won't be able to manage a standalone KVM server since everything has to get built to be managed by the oVirt Engine.

                            FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                            • FATeknollogeeF
                              FATeknollogee @dafyre
                              last edited by

                              @dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:

                              Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                              ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                              Unfortunately not.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Emad RE
                                Emad R @FATeknollogee
                                last edited by

                                @fateknollogee

                                Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                                saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?

                                What type of Gluster volume are you using, just distributed ?

                                I m still learning HCI so thus the beginner vibe

                                FATeknollogeeF travisdh1T scottalanmillerS 5 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Emad RE
                                  Emad R @Francesco Provino
                                  last edited by

                                  @francesco-provino said in Testing oVirt...:

                                  Any real advantage vs plain KVM?

                                  Scaling KVM basically, if you have 1 or 2 KVM servers thats fine, but if you want more you need better management that logging in each one.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • FATeknollogeeF
                                    FATeknollogee @Emad R
                                    last edited by

                                    @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

                                    @fateknollogee

                                    Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                                    saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?

                                    What type of Gluster volume are you using, just distributed ?

                                    I m still learning HCI so thus the beginner vibe

                                    No RAID6, I'm using RAID10.

                                    Gluster volume is Replicate + Arbiter

                                    This is a good blog post to get you started: https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-2-and-gluster-storage/

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • FATeknollogeeF
                                      FATeknollogee @DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                                      @dafyre said in Testing oVirt...:

                                      Can we use the oVirt system to manage an existing KVM server?
                                      ( I want to try oVirt, but really don't want to wipe out the system I currently have set up )

                                      I tried setting up oVirt a few versions ago and from what I could find, it's almost expected you have a minimum of 3 physical hosts for it.

                                      So no, you won't be able to manage a standalone KVM server since everything has to get built to be managed by the oVirt Engine.

                                      You can now do a single host w Gluster:
                                      https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Single_node_hyperconverged/

                                      Here's a screenshot of my single node install:
                                      0_1533646725168_screenshot_27.png

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • FATeknollogeeF
                                        FATeknollogee @Emad R
                                        last edited by

                                        @emad-r said in Testing oVirt...:

                                        @fateknollogee

                                        Let us talk about Gluster, how do you feel safe with it ?

                                        Not sure, since I'm new to the whole Gluster concept.

                                        saw you choose an option with RAID 6, i dont get that cause from my trial, I make RAID and group disks then create Gluster volume from those mdraid volume, but it seems you did RAID 6 afterwards, hmm whats the logic behind that ?

                                        Hardware RAID is recommended instead of MDADM.

                                        DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DustinB3403D
                                          DustinB3403 @FATeknollogee
                                          last edited by

                                          @fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.

                                          Plus you often get features like Blind swap.

                                          FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • FATeknollogeeF
                                            FATeknollogee @DustinB3403
                                            last edited by

                                            @dustinb3403 said in Testing oVirt...:

                                            @fateknollogee Hardware RAID is recommended because a lot of people lack the practice and skill with software RAID to appropriately maintain/troubleshoot/fix software raid.

                                            Plus you often get features like Blind swap.

                                            Nope...
                                            The folks at RH say, currently, performance is better with HW RAID & that is how most of their testing/validation is done.

                                            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 16
                                            • 17
                                            • 9 / 17
                                            • First post
                                              Last post