ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Server Monitoring

    IT Discussion
    17
    75
    4.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      Nice tool, but Windows only. Good for a lot of things, but not as inclusive as SW was. Getting Windows, Mac, Linux, networking all in one is really nice. Even if it doesn't get much info on them, tracking even just that something is a phone can be enough.

      wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • wrx7mW
        wrx7m @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

        Nice tool, but Windows only. Good for a lot of things, but not as inclusive as SW was. Getting Windows, Mac, Linux, networking all in one is really nice. Even if it doesn't get much info on them, tracking even just that something is a phone can be enough.

        Yeah, I have a few Macs and Linux systems.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @wrx7m
          last edited by

          @wrx7m said in Server Monitoring:

          @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

          Nice tool, but Windows only. Good for a lot of things, but not as inclusive as SW was. Getting Windows, Mac, Linux, networking all in one is really nice. Even if it doesn't get much info on them, tracking even just that something is a phone can be enough.

          Yeah, I have a few Macs and Linux systems.

          Just scan those with BASH 🙂

          wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • wrx7mW
            wrx7m @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

            @wrx7m said in Server Monitoring:

            @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

            Nice tool, but Windows only. Good for a lot of things, but not as inclusive as SW was. Getting Windows, Mac, Linux, networking all in one is really nice. Even if it doesn't get much info on them, tracking even just that something is a phone can be enough.

            Yeah, I have a few Macs and Linux systems.

            Just scan those with BASH 🙂

            I need more info on that, please 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • notverypunnyN
              notverypunny
              last edited by

              Seeing as how we've strayed from the initial monitoring topic, I'll throw my standard vote of GLPI+FusionInventory as a SW alternative. Inventory, deployment, ticketing, financials, reporting.... we don't use most of what it can do since certain people don't find it "pretty" enough, but I've got it pulling inventory for something like 600+ endpoints, a fleet of Xerox MFPs and most of our networking gear. They've added a whole datacenter / server room / Rack management module in the last couple of versions that looks like I might be able to move away from Digital Ocean's Netbox system for our datacenter / switch closet documentation.... anyways, I'll stop evangelising now....

              On the monitoring topic, has anyone gotten Zabbix to work reliably without installing an agent? google turns up some results for WMI integration, just wondering how well it works

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @notverypunny
                last edited by

                @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                On the monitoring topic, has anyone gotten Zabbix to work reliably without installing an agent?

                Why would you try? Having an agent is part of the benefit. Agent means easier to manager, and more reliable.

                notverypunnyN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • notverypunnyN
                  notverypunny @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                  @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                  On the monitoring topic, has anyone gotten Zabbix to work reliably without installing an agent?

                  Why would you try? Having an agent is part of the benefit. Agent means easier to manager, and more reliable.

                  Was thinking a test deployment might be easier if it's just a matter of setting up a service account and pushing permissions via GPO

                  wrx7mW scottalanmillerS dafyreD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wrx7mW
                    wrx7m @notverypunny
                    last edited by

                    @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                    @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                    On the monitoring topic, has anyone gotten Zabbix to work reliably without installing an agent?

                    Why would you try? Having an agent is part of the benefit. Agent means easier to manager, and more reliable.

                    Was thinking a test deployment might be easier if it's just a matter of setting up a service account and pushing permissions via GPO

                    If you were pushing permissions via, you could have a software install GPO for the agent.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @notverypunny
                      last edited by

                      @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                      @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                      On the monitoring topic, has anyone gotten Zabbix to work reliably without installing an agent?

                      Why would you try? Having an agent is part of the benefit. Agent means easier to manager, and more reliable.

                      Was thinking a test deployment might be easier if it's just a matter of setting up a service account and pushing permissions via GPO

                      Equal or harder i think. Agents are so easy.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • wrx7mW
                        wrx7m
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller - More info on BASH scanning, please.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @wrx7m
                          last edited by

                          @wrx7m said in Server Monitoring:

                          @scottalanmiller - More info on BASH scanning, please.

                          I assume you are kidding? I was being silly. Meaning... write a script in BASH to do the scanning. Which actually isn't very hard, depending on what you want, assuming you are on a LAN.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            It's common in UNIX shops to do simple scanning with a script. Make a list of servers, put that in a text file. Then do something super simple like...

                            for i in $(cat serverlist); do ssh $i uptime; done
                            

                            And you have a test for uptime on all servers.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                              There is no cloud version of the traditional SW product. Never was. Not from SW, anyway.

                              They are making it. It will use agents on all machines as expected.

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @JaredBusch said in Server Monitoring:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                                There is no cloud version of the traditional SW product. Never was. Not from SW, anyway.

                                They are making it. It will use agents on all machines as expected.

                                Making it now, or someday? Is it something that can be used today?

                                JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                                  @JaredBusch said in Server Monitoring:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                                  There is no cloud version of the traditional SW product. Never was. Not from SW, anyway.

                                  They are making it. It will use agents on all machines as expected.

                                  Making it now, or someday? Is it something that can be used today?

                                  Currently being developed. Not yet released.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                    last edited by

                                    @JaredBusch said in Server Monitoring:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                                    @JaredBusch said in Server Monitoring:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                                    There is no cloud version of the traditional SW product. Never was. Not from SW, anyway.

                                    They are making it. It will use agents on all machines as expected.

                                    Making it now, or someday? Is it something that can be used today?

                                    Currently being developed. Not yet released.

                                    Oh okay. I had heard about something in the works that was going after the SodiumSuite model. But I didn't think anything had released yet. SS was specifically decigned to not overlap with anything SW had or had had.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • wrx7mW
                                      wrx7m
                                      last edited by

                                      I thought SW was all but dead.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch
                                        last edited by

                                        I recorded both of these back on January 26th.

                                        Youtube Video

                                        Youtube Video

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @notverypunny
                                          last edited by

                                          @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Server Monitoring:

                                          @notverypunny said in Server Monitoring:

                                          On the monitoring topic, has anyone gotten Zabbix to work reliably without installing an agent?

                                          Why would you try? Having an agent is part of the benefit. Agent means easier to manager, and more reliable.

                                          Was thinking a test deployment might be easier if it's just a matter of setting up a service account and pushing permissions via GPO

                                          Create a template Zabbix config file, then push the agent & config file however you like, and then set up Zabbix to automatically register new devices and done.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 2 / 4
                                          • First post
                                            Last post