ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Non-IT News Thread

    Water Closet
    91
    11.2k
    5.4m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MattSpellerM
      MattSpeller @Dashrender
      last edited by MattSpeller

      @Dashrender said:

      you have to pay for that "free healthcare" some how.

      lol and I'm super happy to do it, but you may be frightened to learn that none of the taxes on gas / diesel go to it. All to road maintenance and mass transit.

      Edit: I'm wrong, 7.75c / liter go to general funds.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @Dashrender
        last edited by JaredBusch

        @Dashrender said:

        Huh, according to this, it appears that Gas is taxed at a flat per gallon rate, not a percentage.
        http://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-gas-overview/industry-economics/fuel-taxes/gasoline-tax

        California = 59 cents per gallon
        Nebraska = 46 cents per gallon

        There are different kinds of taxes at different points.

        I am intimately familiar with the taxes at the Terminal level. The terminal level is the point where the tanker trucks fill up with fuel to take to the stations.

        Federal and State Motor Fuel Taxes (MFT) are applied at that time. MFT taxes are flat, and not % based.

        I am familiar with them because I re-wrote an invoicing application for a terminal company.

        Here is a load of standard Unleaded with 10% Ethanol. Units in this case is gallons.

        https://i.imgur.com/MQTHlHU.jpg

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @JaredBusch said:

          @Dashrender said:

          Huh, according to this, it appears that Gas is taxed at a flat per gallon rate, not a percentage.
          http://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-gas-overview/industry-economics/fuel-taxes/gasoline-tax

          California = 59 cents per gallon
          Nebraska = 46 cents per gallon

          There are different kinds of taxes at different points.

          I am intimately familiar with the taxes at the Terminal level. The terminal level is the point where the tanker trucks fill up with fuel to take to the stations.

          Federal and State Motor Fuel Taxes (MFT) are applied at that time.

          I am familiar with them because I re-wrote an invoicing application for a terminal company.

          Here is a load of standard Unleaded with 10% Ethanol. Units in this case is gallons.

          https://i.imgur.com/MQTHlHU.jpg

          So where ever that customer is, their tax burden is 37.89 cents a gallon.. that's really good.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @Dashrender
            last edited by JaredBusch

            @Dashrender said:

            @JaredBusch said:

            @Dashrender said:

            Huh, according to this, it appears that Gas is taxed at a flat per gallon rate, not a percentage.
            http://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-gas-overview/industry-economics/fuel-taxes/gasoline-tax

            California = 59 cents per gallon
            Nebraska = 46 cents per gallon

            There are different kinds of taxes at different points.

            I am intimately familiar with the taxes at the Terminal level. The terminal level is the point where the tanker trucks fill up with fuel to take to the stations.

            Federal and State Motor Fuel Taxes (MFT) are applied at that time.

            I am familiar with them because I re-wrote an invoicing application for a terminal company.

            Here is a load of standard Unleaded with 10% Ethanol. Units in this case is gallons.

            https://i.imgur.com/MQTHlHU.jpg

            So where ever that customer is, their tax burden is 37.89 cents a gallon.. that's really good.

            No, that is still prior to sales taxes and such. this is ONLY the MFT. There are more taxes at the station level that I am not familiar with like this.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • gjacobseG
              gjacobse
              last edited by

              GLENN FREY - EAGLES GUITARIST DEAD AT 67

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • gjacobseG
                gjacobse
                last edited by

                Sheriff deputies seize $7.5M worth of marijuana from RV

                RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RojoLocoR
                  RojoLoco @gjacobse
                  last edited by

                  @gjacobse they valued that at $5000 a pound? I feel like that is a gross overestimation....

                  coliverC gjacobseG 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • coliverC
                    coliver @RojoLoco
                    last edited by

                    @RojoLoco said:

                    @gjacobse they valued that at $5000 a pound? I feel like that is a gross overestimation....

                    High quality

                    RojoLocoR nadnerBN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • RojoLocoR
                      RojoLoco @coliver
                      last edited by

                      @coliver said:

                      @RojoLoco said:

                      @gjacobse they valued that at $5000 a pound? I feel like that is a gross overestimation....

                      High quality

                      Seriously doubt that pallet of hefty bags is the good shit. Even for regular dirt weed, that's maximum retail.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gjacobseG
                        gjacobse @RojoLoco
                        last edited by

                        @RojoLoco
                        I didn't do the numbers... And I don't know jack about that trade.. But at 1,500 pounds.. that is a long time of smoking..

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @gjacobse
                          last edited by

                          @gjacobse said:

                          @RojoLoco
                          I didn't do the numbers... And I don't know jack about that trade.. But at 1,500 pounds.. that is a long time of smoking..

                          This calls for a Cheech and Chong meme I know it does.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • nadnerBN
                            nadnerB @coliver
                            last edited by

                            @coliver said:

                            @RojoLoco said:

                            @gjacobse they valued that at $5000 a pound? I feel like that is a gross overestimation....

                            High quality

                            I see what you did there 😉

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • brianlittlejohnB
                              brianlittlejohn
                              last edited by

                              Researchers at Caltech find evidence that suggests ninth planet in our solar system (10th if you still count pluto)

                              http://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-find-evidence-real-ninth-planet-49523

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                How the heck do we mistake Pluto for a planet for a century and miss a "real ninth planet?

                                brianlittlejohnB coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • brianlittlejohnB
                                  brianlittlejohn @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller I think it has to do with how far out it is.... its estimate closest point to the sun is 5x further out then pluto.

                                  scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/www-prod-storage.cloud.caltech.edu/styles/article_photo/s3/Planet-9-Art-NEWS-WEB.jpg?itok=bldOkPAS

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @brianlittlejohn
                                      last edited by

                                      @brianlittlejohn said:

                                      @scottalanmiller I think it has to do with how far out it is.... its estimate closest point to the sun is 5x further out then pluto.

                                      Yeah, they said it is 20x the distance of Neptune, and Neptune is even farther out than Pluto (on average.)

                                      brianlittlejohnB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • brianlittlejohnB
                                        brianlittlejohn @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller The data suggests an eliptical orbit of ranging from 200AU at the periapsis and and up to 1200AU at apoapsis. Neptune averages 30AU from the sun.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          that's about 20x then 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • brianlittlejohnB
                                            brianlittlejohn
                                            last edited by

                                            Of course it may not exist at all... the models they ran are explaining what may be affecting orbits of smaller objects from the kuiper belt.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 70
                                            • 71
                                            • 72
                                            • 73
                                            • 74
                                            • 560
                                            • 561
                                            • 72 / 561
                                            • First post
                                              Last post