Non-IT News Thread
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
If Mrs May is fired, doesn't the Brexit vote still proceed, but with someone else who is going to be stuck in this shit-sandwich situation?
Yes, but without May, there is a strong chance for a rational attempt to either stop the Brexit, fix the Brexit, or the most likely thing... call for another vote based on reality instead of lies and see what the actual desire of the people is.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller TL:DR Mrs May is the Donald Trump of the UK.
Is all I needed.
That's kinda how it is, yeah.
Okay so she's just as bat-shit crazy as the Don, and wants Mexico (Italy) to pay for it?
(that's a pun)
But what did the people think they would get when they voted to leave the EU? If Mrs May is fired, doesn't the Brexit vote still proceed, but with someone else who is going to be stuck in this shit-sandwich situation?
Also, from my meager understanding of the issue, May was initially against Brexit but has inherited the problem.... so imagine that the next time around Don Don is booted out, replaced with someone like Mrs Obama and she now has to figure out how to make his Mexico wall happen.... I'd go batshit crazy in that situation too
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
If Mrs May is fired, doesn't the Brexit vote still proceed, but with someone else who is going to be stuck in this shit-sandwich situation?
Yes, but without May, there is a strong chance for a rational attempt to either stop the Brexit, fix the Brexit, or the most likely thing... call for another vote based on reality instead of lies and see what the actual desire of the people is.
Gotcha. So the issue is, she's trying to pass a shit-sandwich as Filet mignon.
And her co-chefs want her to sell it as the shit-sandwich it is or to get the hell out of the kitchen.
-
So
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
It's actually become a discussion case of why it is democratically wrong to allow the elderly to vote on things that don't affect them, but not allow youths to vote on things that will affect them their entire lives.
I get the elderly part, people dying of old age. But how were younger people not allowed to vote on this matter? I assume the voting age is something in the range like with the US. 18, no?
-
And as another question @scottalanmiller
How do the elderly get a payout by leaving the EU?
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
So
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
It's actually become a discussion case of why it is democratically wrong to allow the elderly to vote on things that don't affect them, but not allow youths to vote on things that will affect them their entire lives.
I get the elderly part, people dying of old age. But how were younger people not allowed to vote on this matter? I assume the voting age is something in the range like with the US. 18, no?
Yes, but the vote was years ago. So people who were, say 14, at the time of the original vote got zero vote in their own future. But now are becoming adults and must live with the results forever.
This kind of vote isn't about something to do "now", it's about changing the state of the country far in the future. So the people doing the initial vote were demographically quite a bit different than the people who are forced to action, let alone with with, the consequences of it.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
And as another question @scottalanmiller
How do the elderly get a payout by leaving the EU?
They were promised all kinds of things that were elderly benefits in return for voting against the good of their children and grandchildren. They were promised special healthcare benefits and things (that of course, were not delivered.)
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
If Mrs May is fired, doesn't the Brexit vote still proceed, but with someone else who is going to be stuck in this shit-sandwich situation?
Yes, but without May, there is a strong chance for a rational attempt to either stop the Brexit, fix the Brexit, or the most likely thing... call for another vote based on reality instead of lies and see what the actual desire of the people is.
Gotcha. So the issue is, she's trying to pass a shit-sandwich as Filet mignon.
And her co-chefs want her to sell it as the shit-sandwich it is or to get the hell out of the kitchen.
Basically
-
@notverypunny said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller TL:DR Mrs May is the Donald Trump of the UK.
Is all I needed.
That's kinda how it is, yeah.
Okay so she's just as bat-shit crazy as the Don, and wants Mexico (Italy) to pay for it?
(that's a pun)
But what did the people think they would get when they voted to leave the EU? If Mrs May is fired, doesn't the Brexit vote still proceed, but with someone else who is going to be stuck in this shit-sandwich situation?
Also, from my meager understanding of the issue, May was initially against Brexit but has inherited the problem.... so imagine that the next time around Don Don is booted out, replaced with someone like Mrs Obama and she now has to figure out how to make his Mexico wall happen.... I'd go batshit crazy in that situation too
Yeah, that's a bit weird. I believe she was against it, but now is insane and seems to have lost all sense of reality and is "Brexit in name, at any cost", which is never good.
But she has had awesome options at her disposal all alone and refused to take them. She made something bad into something much much worse.
-
-
Brexit defeat was good for the pound.
-
Old news but worth it..
Rocco The Cheeky Parrot Keeps Using Amazon’s Alexa To Order Snacks
The African grey interacts with the virtual assistant up to 40 times a day, asking it to tell him jokes and play his favorite music.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@notverypunny said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller TL:DR Mrs May is the Donald Trump of the UK.
Is all I needed.
That's kinda how it is, yeah.
Okay so she's just as bat-shit crazy as the Don, and wants Mexico (Italy) to pay for it?
(that's a pun)
But what did the people think they would get when they voted to leave the EU? If Mrs May is fired, doesn't the Brexit vote still proceed, but with someone else who is going to be stuck in this shit-sandwich situation?
Also, from my meager understanding of the issue, May was initially against Brexit but has inherited the problem.... so imagine that the next time around Don Don is booted out, replaced with someone like Mrs Obama and she now has to figure out how to make his Mexico wall happen.... I'd go batshit crazy in that situation too
Yeah, that's a bit weird. I believe she was against it, but now is insane and seems to have lost all sense of reality and is "Brexit in name, at any cost", which is never good.
But she has had awesome options at her disposal all alone and refused to take them. She made something bad into something much much worse.
What I find interesting about this whole thing. The crown has basically unlimited veto power. The Queen could easily prevent Brexit from happening. Although maybe there is a significant political issue there.
-
Psychologists defend claim of “destructive aspects” to masculinity
Critics argue new psychology guidance pathologizes being male.
The American Psychological Association is on the defensive over its newly released clinical guidance (PDF) for treating boys and men, which links traditional masculinity ideology to a range of harms, including sexism, violence, mental health issues, suicide, and homophobia. Critics contend that the guidelines attack traditional values and innate characteristics of males.
-
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Psychologists defend claim of “destructive aspects” to masculinity
Critics argue new psychology guidance pathologizes being male.
The American Psychological Association is on the defensive over its newly released clinical guidance (PDF) for treating boys and men, which links traditional masculinity ideology to a range of harms, including sexism, violence, mental health issues, suicide, and homophobia. Critics contend that the guidelines attack traditional values and innate characteristics of males.
Were they taking notes from @RojoLoco? (Keep it up, we like you how you are!)
-
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Psychologists defend claim of “destructive aspects” to masculinity
Critics argue new psychology guidance pathologizes being male.
The American Psychological Association is on the defensive over its newly released clinical guidance (PDF) for treating boys and men, which links traditional masculinity ideology to a range of harms, including sexism, violence, mental health issues, suicide, and homophobia. Critics contend that the guidelines attack traditional values and innate characteristics of males.
LOL - traits that help the gender in pretty much every other species.
/sigh. -
Someone needs to do a study on the dangers of the traits of psychologists. It is commonly understood that a large percentage of people find the field interesting due to a history of their own mental struggles. One could pathologize psychologists pretty easily.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
Someone needs to do a study on the dangers of the traits of psychologists. It is commonly understood that a large percentage of people find the field interesting due to a history of their own mental struggles. One could pathologize psychologists pretty easily.
That could potentially be true for many professions.
-
@Obsolesce said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
Someone needs to do a study on the dangers of the traits of psychologists. It is commonly understood that a large percentage of people find the field interesting due to a history of their own mental struggles. One could pathologize psychologists pretty easily.
That could potentially be true for many professions.
But "most" aren't "mental health issues." That's the key. Like going into sport medicine because you played sports and pulled a muscle and found the treatment interesting is very different.
