ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Windows 10 Release; July 29

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
    25 Posts 7 Posters 6.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @dafyre
      last edited by

      @dafyre I used Vista for nearly six years at a big bank and never had an issue with it. Was rock solid when patched and used as directed. There were some issues on first release, which was not too surprising considering it was such a leap into the NT 6 family from the NT 5 family and there had been so much time in between. But by the time that Windows 7 was out, Vista had all of that stability back ported. They were really on parity pretty much the entire era. Considering Windows 7 was only a minor update to Vista, it is not surprising that nearly everything made it back to Vista.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • garak0410G
        garak0410 @StrongBad
        last edited by garak0410

        @StrongBad said:

        The public never likes anything that is new, that's just how they are. For the most part, every Windows release works. Even Vista worked pretty well, people just reacted poorly to it. They had had XP for so long without a change and XP was really pretty close to 2000 before it so the changes had been pretty minor for a pretty long time by the time that Vista came out. I wonder if the biggest blunder with Vista was attempting to ride on XP's coattails for too long?

        I defended Vista early on until I started having the "Vista Issues"...the biggest one, and one they never resolved was, that even after many rebuilds, if I would right click something in file explorer to get the context menu, it could take 1-2 minutes for context menu to show up... 😞

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Never saw that one. Did not get too many new installs, only a handful over the years.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @garak0410
            last edited by

            @garak0410 said:

            @g.jacobse said:

            I have not seen Build 10159 as of yet, still on 10158 -

            I have been having some issues of late - however I can not say they are with the Win10 build

            Well, hang on...10162 just released now... 🙂

            Say WHAT?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dafyreD
              dafyre
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller Among my peers, you would be in the minority. We simply didn't have good results with it at all. I know that's not a scientific study, lol. But we tend to stick with what we know works, so at my last place, we largely waited for Windows 7, IIRC.

              I'll probably just go ahead and upgrade to Windows 10 on my laptop when it comes out. I have a good backup of it now (Veeam Endpoint, FTW!), so I'm safe, lol.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                We had over 100,000 people using it. I'm sure many had problems. But in the hundreds of people that I was in contact with I can't remember hearing of any complaints. And we ran it from nearly right at release until Windows 8 was out for a bit.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @dafyre I used Vista for nearly six years at a big bank and never had an issue with it. Was rock solid when patched and used as directed. There were some issues on first release, which was not too surprising considering it was such a leap into the NT 6 family from the NT 5 family and there had been so much time in between. But by the time that Windows 7 was out, Vista had all of that stability back ported. They were really on parity pretty much the entire era. Considering Windows 7 was only a minor update to Vista, it is not surprising that nearly everything made it back to Vista.

                  Hey me too. The only reason I moved to Windows 7 at work when I did was because my HD crashed. I loved Vista at the time.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said:

                    Hey me too. The only reason I moved to Windows 7 at work when I did was because my HD crashed. I loved Vista at the time.

                    I wouldn't say that I loved it, but it was perfectly fine. I had Windows 7 and then 8 at home and would have preferred that they stayed up to date. But it was better than XP and no one seemed to have any issues with it.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      Well I only loved it until Windows 7 came out.

                      Vista did have issues on initial release, most of which were completely fixed in SP1.

                      The strange thing for me was that OEM installs for the only time in history actually worked better than formatting and starting it over and only installing the drivers from the manufacture.

                      MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • MattSpellerM
                        MattSpeller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        Well I only loved it until Windows 7 came out.

                        Vista did have issues on initial release, most of which were completely fixed in SP1.

                        The strange thing for me was that OEM installs for the only time in history actually worked better than formatting and starting it over and only installing the drivers from the manufacture.

                        I also liked vista but it was really slow on even moderate hardware for the day - that's what killed it more than anything else IMHO. XP could run circles around it for speed on cheaper hardware.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 1 / 2
                        • First post
                          Last post