ZeroTier: is this a good time to use...
- 
@wrx7m said:
Would love to know if they have already started on a gateway.
We already have people in the community using gateways.
 - 
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
 - 
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
What he said
 - 
Interesting that their site, at least a couple weeks ago said something to the effect of it being considered.
 - 
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
I thought we are getting rid of the VPN?
 - 
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
I thought we are getting rid of the VPN?
But you are asking about installing a VPN. I'm confused.
 - 
Are you thinking that ZeroTier is not a VPN? ZeroTier is a VPN, that's what it is.
 - 
@scottalanmiller said:
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
I thought we are getting rid of the VPN?
But you are asking about installing a VPN. I'm confused.
Currently, we use a Site to Site VPN & remote users connect using Windows VPN
 - 
@scottalanmiller Probably meaning the more traditional VPN he is currently using.
 - 
 - 
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
I thought we are getting rid of the VPN?
But you are asking about installing a VPN. I'm confused.
Currently, we use a Site to Site VPN & remote users connect using Windows VPN
You are just removing your old VPN and looking at a new one. Both are fully VPNs.
 - 
@FATeknollogee said:
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller Probably meaning the more traditional VPN he is currently using.
Yes
That's a very confusing way to say it. It's just an upgrade to something more modern, not a change of technology.
 - 
Gateway = bridge mode?
 - 
@scottalanmiller said:
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
I thought we are getting rid of the VPN?
But you are asking about installing a VPN. I'm confused.
Currently, we use a Site to Site VPN & remote users connect using Windows VPN
You are just removing your old VPN and looking at a new one. Both are fully VPNs.
I hear you, that "VPN" moniker is just so yesterday...I much prefer to say ZT

 - 
But it's still a VPN

 - 
@Breffni-Potter said:
But it's still a VPN

Yeah, but we need to make it sound like its a really big deal (jk). Like the "cloud"
 - 
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@FATeknollogee said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Why would you want a terminal server intentionally dropping off of the network?
They want to stop access for over-seas consultants at certain times.
Killing VPN access to the network is not a good way to go about that. Using AD to stop logins would be far better.
I thought we are getting rid of the VPN?
But you are asking about installing a VPN. I'm confused.
Currently, we use a Site to Site VPN & remote users connect using Windows VPN
You are just removing your old VPN and looking at a new one. Both are fully VPNs.
I hear you, that "VPN" moniker is just so yesterday...I much prefer to say ZT

But ones a product, ones a thing. ZT is the brand of VPN you are using.
 - 
@FATeknollogee said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
But it's still a VPN

Yeah, but we need to make it sound like its a really big deal (jk). Like the "cloud"
then you call it "Software Defined Networking".
 - 
 - 
@scottalanmiller said:
But ones a product, ones a thing. ZT is the brand of VPN you are using.
True that
 
