ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. cakeis_not_alie
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 4
    • Posts 73
    • Groups 1

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: What is Real Hyperconverged Infrastructure?

      @scale Hyperconvergence is: buying servers + storage together and getting a resilient infrastructure that can run workloads.

      Hyperconvergence lowers my floor cost. Instead of 2 servers + 2 storage devices I get 3 servers. Much cheaper, considering how much vendors charge for storage arrays! Scaling is also easier: add a node and get compute + storage.

      Hyperconvergence isn't a private cloud. It is not "AWS in a can". At least, not yet. (I am personally kicking vendor asses in this direction, but you vendors have such large asses. They take muchos kicking.)

      Marketing lingo dispensed with, hyperconergence is ease of use. It's IT infrastructure for people who don't have time to fuss over IT infrastructure. And by that definition, Scale has served me extremely well. So kudos to Scale...

      ...and long may the Scale Legion reign!

      posted in Scale Legion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • Win an NVMe card!

      ioFABRIC is giving away an NVMe card to the person who submits a winning design for how they'd use ioFABRIC's Vicinity in their lab.

      http://www.iofabric.com/nvme-contest/ <-- Winner picks the form factor!

      Only one day left, but worth a few minutes out of your day!

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • The Accidental Sysadmin

      Hello ladies, gentlemen, and assorted honoured edge-case gendered individuals.

      We're relaunching WeBreakTech with a brand new idea: actual content! As part of our evil plans to write things people want to read, we've taken on a new columnist, Katherine Gorham, a.k.a. "The Accidental Sysadmin". Her first column is here: http://webreaktech.com/2016/10/03/the-accidental-sysadmin/

      I know that a lot of people on Mango Lassi are accidental sysadmins; folks who ended up in the role not because they sought out IT as a career, but because they "knew computers". Here's hoping Kat's writing helps those folks feel less alone.

      Cheers, and have a great week to everyone!

      posted in Self Promotion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: at cakeis not alie looking for Ubiquiti experience

      Following up on this thread, the above information worked. Removing the "any" and replacing with "the external IP of the box into which you are currently logged in" solved the problem.

      Roar! It sucks that "any" is in literally every other piece of configuration information about site-to-site VPNs for Ubiquiti! Hat's off to Jared Busch for his knowledge of edge cases, and a case of beer owed for my salvation.

      Cheers to all who helped.

      posted in IT Discussion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • Magnus369 / Phillip Lesley needs our help

      It is probably gauche to simply point to a Spiceworks thread here. I am sure it breaks all the rules of everything. But my friend needs help, and I am spreading the word to everyone I know who might care. Please check out http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/751239-spicesignal-podcasting-for-cancer and see if you can't chip in. Even if you don't have money to spare, you might have time to write a blog or participate in a podcast. These can help us get vendors to donate.

      I apologize for breaking rules by cross posting to here, and thank any/all of you for taking the time to read.

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: AWS shock tests its data storage boxes

      @MattSpeller Forget my BBQ. Have you seen this: https://iosafe.com/products-server5-overview ?

      Xeon-D capable of 8 cores and 128GB of RAM in a fireproof box with up to 8 3.5" hard drives. I have a nerd boner that can be seen from space.

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: AWS shock tests its data storage boxes

      Clearly, we need to find someone else to blame for this mess. Now where'd I put that bag of dice...

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: What Are You Doing Right Now

      @MattSpeller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

      Wondering if Trevor Pott still hangs out around here. Also, how many beers I'd need to buy him to get an article about the new epyc chips.

      You summoned me?

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: Simplivity - anyone use them?

      Dear everyone in this thread:

      SimpliVity are amazing, and I will punch anyone who disagrees in a sensitive body part.

      Listen to me: you all know me. You know that I am both a very loud customer advocate and one of the loudest, most irritating voices for dropping prices. I need to say this very loudly and very clearly: SimpliVity are a fantastic company, with top notch service and a damned-near-impossible to beat product.

      Like any company, they aren't going to meet every single niche need. They certainly aren't the cheapest on the market. They aren't trying to be all things to all people and they aren't trying to be the low cost supplier, so it's not shocking that they are neither.

      What they are is the absolute best, full stop, at data efficiency. Nobody manages to do data efficiency as thoroughly as they do, at the speeds they do and with the WAN efficiency that they do. This is SimpliVity's schitck, and it has real world implications.

      The first is the aforementioned WAN efficiency. The second is that highly similar workloads (such as VDI) absolutely scream on SimpliVity. I could go on, but you get the idea.

      Does this make SimpliVity something of a "luxury car" for hyperconvergence? Absolutely. But it's not "a Lamborghini", it's more of a "Tesla Roadster". The price isn't about pointless flash; you get something different for your money, and different enough that it becomes addictive to those who can afford to use it. The money isn't spend on flash or brand name; they deliver actual value for it.

      Now, I'd be the first to piss on them for overcharging or otherwise not living up to their promise. Everyone here should know that about me by now. I have, in fact, been in multiple meetings with their top brass where I am the loudest customer advocacy voice in the room, demanding they meet this need, or that requirement, and lower the price.

      Despite that, they don't deserve to be pooped on. They aren't all things to all people, but they are absolutely untouchable at what they do.

      Cheers.

      posted in IT Discussion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: I am defeated

      @nadnerB I thought SAM was "people". As in a collection of individuals that make up his post count. DOOM!

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: AWS shock tests its data storage boxes

      Who? What? Where?

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: What Are You Doing Right Now

      @MattSpeller returns to the mists of the test lab

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: The Accidental Sysadmin

      @stess It's just because she's hanging out on a switch. She's hanging out beign cute.

      Actually, she ended up claiming that switch as her "home" and turned the whole half rack into her territory. Because she is the dominant lizard and you will obey!

      posted in Self Promotion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: at cakeis not alie looking for Ubiquiti experience

      So here is the deal:

      Executive Level Body purchased two Ubiquiti Edgemax devices. One for his network one for his office network. He demands that the site-to-site VPN be set up between them.

      Unit on his end needs to be a NAT router for his home network(s). Unit on this end is only for his VPN access and nothing else.

      No matter how this is set up, Executive Level Body must be able to use the UI on the routers (both of them) to change IPs of the VPN configuration and/or the shared secret and have it work.

      No, he cannot use the command line. Any solution which requires ongoing configuration of the devices to use the command line is simply not acceptable for this situation.

      The units are running EdgeRouter Lite 1.8.0.

      I have absolutely no idea how to configure these things. I have attached a picture below to show what I have attempted. It is the same on both sides, with the exception of the target external IP (naturally) and the description.

      I have no made changes to the firewall. There is a tickbox on the router that looks like it will do so, but no firewall rules appear to be created (at least in the UI).

      Help!

      0_1464975909876_Ubiquiti.PNG

      posted in IT Discussion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • I am defeated

      There’s a lot more to doing IT for an SMB than finding technical perfection. Many of you don’t work in the smallest of the small SMB IT. SAM, for example, lives in what I would consider to be the cushy lap of luxury, floating on enormous budgets and working with companies who see value in three year refresh cycles.

      SAM would tell me I’m crazy; he’s got plenty of SMB IT experience and I’m just a grouchy old git. John Frappier would tell us both we’re nuts, that he works in SMB IT and that IT for schools is small potatoes compared to “proper” IT.

      Up and up and up the stack we go. I have a testlab that is worth the IT infrastructure of 20 of my clients put together. SAM has home IT that would trounce 85% of my clients, I am sure. Most of the people reading this have more up to date home PC towers than my clients have servers…and we all stopped buying PCs years ago.

      Now, the above is filled with a bunch of generalisations. I know that. Allow me some artistic license here, I’m venting.

      The point I’m trying to get across is that IT is diverse. It’s more diverse as you read this than when I wrote it. It’s more diverse when I wrote it than when I thought of it. And it’s certainly more diverse today than it was when we all started our technological escapades in the first place.

      Yet we are all brand tribalists. We get in our heads that something is bad, or that something is good. We crusade for or against something. We champion brands, people, and even entire classes of solutions. I’m guilty of it. You, the reader, are guilty of it. Every single one of us is guilty of it.

      What drives me mad is that we always seem unable to stop and remember that diversity thing. That what SAM thinks is “normal” and “small” is positively opulent to me. That what I think is “normal” and “small” would have seemed beyond opulent to 15 year old me.

      We don’t all get the chance to do things by the book.

      We don’t all get the chance to do things within support.

      Hell, we don’t all even get the chance to buy new network cables when they’re needed.

      So where do people like that go? Where is the discussion group for people who would consider the kinds of things SAM throws away to be upgrades? Where do the majority of the world’s sysadmins go, when Spiceworks drives these “leeches” out of the ecosystem, and MangoLassi is populated largely by people who have moved up the chain so long ago we don’t remember what it’s like to have your only UPS be 10 years old and running off of salvaged motorcycle batteries?

      Where to the people running ESXi free in production and who are happy they managed to get hardware even capable of doing that congregate?

      I don’t have answers. I am hoping you do. Because I am broken and I am defeated. I am tired of being told what a failure I am, and how worthless my clients are. I am tired of being told that thousands of people shouldn’t have jobs because we can’t afford to do things in a way that is beneficial to some commercial entity.

      I am tired of trying to explain to someone the importance of “ease of use”, because it’s completely different when you have to be master of 200 different applications and all of the infrastructure to run them than it is when you get to be a specialist in just one class of (or even just one) application.

      Most of all, I am sick unto death of this attitude that pervades out industry that any one solution is suitable for all people, or that the fact that a product is better in some (frankly irrelevant) technical way means that everyone should buy it, even when they don’t have the money to do so.

      I got into IT to help people. Computers were supposed to make our lives better. I still believe that’s what they’re here to do. And I don’t believe “efficiency” means what most of these vendors think it does.

      I’ve built an entire career out of making what other people call “impossible” work in the real world. I have built an entire career out of creating solutions that never should have worked work anyways, through sheer force of will.

      It’s a young man’s game, but I know for a fact that I am not alone. There are hundreds of thousands of my fellow systems administrators who live that life. Hundreds of thousands of us who string by on the bleeding edge of nothing.

      I’m sick of being told we’re worthless and that we should fade away. But I’m far too broken to fight to carve out a niche somewhere else.

      So where do we go? Here? A look at the most frequent posters for MangoLassi shows a lot of the people I typically associate with being really down us “junk peddlers”. I don’t think we meet the minimum richness threshold for MangoLassi.

      So are there other communities? Do I need to start impovrishednerds.com? I don’t have answers. I rather hope you lot do.

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: Simplivity - anyone use them?

      @Breffni-Potter Who says SimpliVity wants to enter the SMB space? Anyone telling you that is nuts.

      SimpliVity are a midmarket and enterprise supplier. They don't have an SMB play worth mentioning. They aren't here to cater to the nickle-and-dime customers who cost more in support than the margins you'll make off them. They are making more than enough money playing the midmarket and higher spaces that they can - and from a purely business standpoint should - stay there for quite some time.

      SimpliVity doesn't need to pander to the SMB market until the midmarket is so saturated that they need to go make a volume play. When they're ready to do that in earnest a lot of things will change in SimpliVity's approach.

      Right now, SimpliVity makes their wins off of companies that have muchos big time branch offices and need a solution that lowers costs when compared to having to run basically a rack's worth of stuff at each branch location in order to squeeze the data through the tubes every night. They make money here and they're very, very good at squaring this circle.

      For the poverty-tier folks - myself included - there are lots of other vendors. The really ghetto types can choose Starwind and <censored for legal reasons>. Or they can go use Nodeweaver from Cloudweavers if they want proper HCI that actually works, for as low as humanly possible.

      A step up from that into a more expensive world is Scale Computing, and they're excellent, VMware's VSAN comes in around the same price for a different, but equal featureset.

      You could go Nutanix, but their performance is made out of buttinase unless you devote WAY too much RAM to their VSA, and then you don't have room for workloads. Their SMB play is mostly brochureware.

      Stepping up from the barest of bare bones and into the realm of the midmarket you start to see actual competition. Scale plays here. SimpliVity, Nutanix, Pivot3, many, many others...and they all have deltas between list and street that are significant.

      Here, picking the right HCI vendor is about needs and featureset. And the purchasing cycle is usually months long and involves a POC. (Or ten.)

      But if you are poverty tier like me, let me be perfectly, 100%, crystal clear: SimpliVity, and 99.999999999999999975% of vendors simply don't want to deal with you, because you cost more to acquire and support than you are worth.

      In the realm of "caters to poverty tier clients" basically the only solution that anyone should trust is Nodeweaver, and I still don't understand why they're so damned cheap. Their stuff works, and they should be charging 2x-3x what they do for it. Eventually, I'm sure they will.

      Everyone else who plays down at our level...well...Groucho Marx said it best:

      I wouldn't want to be part of any club that would have me as a member.

      If your whole beef with SimpliVity is that they aren't going to suck you a rapture for a bent copper, I'm sorry to say, but they - rightly - don't, won't and shouldn't care. Not for another 10 years or so, anyways.

      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a datacenter full of cobbled together whitebox servers and sadness that needs my tender care and attention...

      posted in IT Discussion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: I am defeated

      @cakeis_not_alie Related: today I learned that Spiceworks has an ignore feature: http://community.spiceworks.com/blogs/products/1785-community-preview-user-muting

      This won't help the place become more friendly, but at least it will prevent me from righteously toothbrush shanking a few of them at the next Spiceworld. XD

      Seriously though, it's amazing how big a difference such features can make. El Reg enabled it on the forums a while back, and they got a LOT better once you could clean off the worst of the trolls.

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: Another Personal Storage Discussion

      Apologies if this is a little bit "self promotion", but I may have a relevant article for this discussion: http://webreaktech.com/2016/10/03/archival-cloud-storage-can-be-an-affordable-backup-layer/

      Cheers to all!

      posted in IT Discussion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: I am defeated

      @Martin9700 "Which seems odd if you're trying to do automation and NOT spend tons of money. So many things you can do with PowerShell! We have 2 dedicated servers at my work that ALL they do is run PowerShell scripts (maybe 1 old VBS)!"

      Not really. Group Policy handles almost all the automation I need. Windows is a wrapper for some legacy applications, that's about it. I don't need Windows to do much except "not crash".

      99.95% of my "automation" is done on Linux systems. The overwhelming majority of that automation is pulling various kinds of information from various systems, translating, then injecting. For example, pulling an HTML report from one server, stripping out the useful information and then translating that to XML, which we then inject via API into another system.

      I do virtually all of that work with PHP and shell scripts. All the rest of the automation I require is VMware-based, and most of htat is handled by actual applications (like Veeam).

      For me at least, Windows is a legacy platform. It's something I'm forced to use, not something I choose to use. When and where there is a specific need to mount up a Windows application, I will. Outside of that, everything I run goes on Linux. The licensing is just easier.

      posted in Water Closet
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • RE: Another Personal Storage Discussion

      @BRRABill Why run Onedrive, Sync, Dropbox, etc on the local machine unless that machine tends to leave the office? Run it on a NAS so you download once for a fixed site, for multiple people to access from. Then mobile users can enable a local client that downloads selected folders onto their local device as needed.

      The NAS can encypt (so can the mobile devices) and it can back up to Backblaze/Glacier/etc in addition to its duties syncing with Onedrive/Sync/Dropbox/etc.

      posted in IT Discussion
      cakeis_not_alieC
      cakeis_not_alie
    • 1 / 1