@IRJ said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@Dashrender said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Short of an audit by Microsoft specifically where they look at use, nothing will likely ever happen.
Exactly
Just because you may never have any negative consequences of doing this, doesn't mean you should still do it. .
@IRJ said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@IRJ said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@Dashrender said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Short of an audit by Microsoft specifically where they look at use, nothing will likely ever happen.
Exactly
Just because you may never have any negative consequences of doing this, doesn't mean you should still do it. .
So don't do it. Don't go around tattling on people to Microsoft either.
I don't think anyone was tattling to Microsoft (at least not that I saw in this thread). But there are reward programs from Microsoft for just this sort of thing.
It could be in my interest to send that to MS just to be potentially rewarded. Not that I care in this argument, I neither have any evidence of this (besides this topic) nor am I motivated.
@IRJ said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
I don't think anyone was tattling to Microsoft (at least not that I saw in this thread). But there are reward programs from Microsoft for just this sort of thing.
Please tell me the crime?
It doesn't need to be a crime, for fuck's sake. A crime has laws around it. An EULA issue isn't a crime, it , the EULA, simply allows two entities know what they can and cannot do with regards to what the hell ever.
MS would have to take the end user to court if they did this themselves. If ConnectWise is selling this as a turnkey solution, then MS could very easily take ConnectWise to court for violating the EULA that they agree'd to when they setup said turnkey.
Since this is a paid solution we're discussing it would be very easy to draw a line of responsibility to the vendor of said system who was violating the EULA.
In any scenario, the suggestion of doing something that violates the EULA, isn't illegal, just shady as all fuck. Because it's putting their customers on the hook to make their TCO look cheaper than it actually is at whatever scale is being discussed.
Which in a conversation like this one, with ConnectWise going up from 1000-10000+ devices is a lot of Device CALs a business could just skip out on purchasing (because who's actually checking, right?)
Well that would be a lot of reasons for Microsoft to come knocking on your door and audit you.
Don't use technology as a replacement for being a parent.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I've charged my fell XPS with an apple USB charger.
I the wattage of the Dell charger is 45w if you wa Testo get an exact match.
@Pete-S said in RDP to RDP to RDP?:
@IRJ said in RDP to RDP to RDP?:
@Pete-S said in RDP to RDP to RDP?:
Is there a smarter way to connect through several RDP sessions instead of doing each one manually?
So if you want to go:
host1 -> host2 -> host3Is there a way to do this in one step instead of first connecting to host1 then from there start a connection to host2 and then from there start a connection to host3?
Why can't you just connect to host 3?
I am assuming host 1 is a public IP and host2 and host3 are internal?
Yes, host 1 is reached over VPN and the rest are different internal networks and subnets with firewall restrictions. Enterprise customers. So the only way is to connect to the servers in this particular order.
So you're asking us how you would circumvent your customers network?
I guess just install TeamViewer or the likes on host 3 and go from there. Set up an additional password at a minimum.
@Obsolesce said in Wazuh when I write the rule I encounter with a problem (Nmap Scripting:
Thanks for the page, unfortunately I'm not sure I can help with is issue, I'll try though.
@kemal-tunc what error are you receiving?
Thanks guys I'll take a look once I'm free, dad duties have me tied up
@dafyre said in Looking for a NC host for an Open Source project:
If you still need a place, I've got a NextCloud server that can host it.
I may take you up on it in a bit, still working with @travisdh1 to see what might be going on with his system.
If you'd like to grab the existing file and drop it into your NC instance though the link is here - direct download
@IRJ said in Jared - OBS:
Can you take already recorded video and slow the framerate down with OBS?
Not with obs, no. You'd do this is a video editing software. Not the capture software.
@scottalanmiller said in Linux History: Not clearing between -:
@gjacobse said in Linux History: Not clearing between -:
This has been helpful - I've managed to edit the file, and after making a backup, and editing it down to clear out the garbage.
It's a history, clearing stuff out doesn't really make sense.
It does if he wants to document a process to getting something to work and only having valid commands visible.
If he had a typo or whatever else, leaving that in the history could cause issues later.
You can readily migrate exchange to office 365, large files on the otherhand are always an issue as they would need to be downloaded to the workstation for each edit.
You could use OneDrive as a means to sync files locally and to the cloud, but that generally means keeping files on workstations.
So far I've seen a heavy mix of cloud for non-file share services and on-premise for file sharing that gets backed up to cloud.
I got it sorted out, the rule did work, but the firewall wasn't forwarding port 80 to the target host.
I was wondering why it worked from inside the lan, but not from the WAN. Anyways it's working now.
@Pete-S said in Xen Orchestra - Community Edition - Installing with Yarn:
@travisdh1 said in Xen Orchestra - Community Edition - Installing with Yarn:
@DustinB3403 said in Xen Orchestra - Community Edition - Installing with Yarn:
@travisdh1 what issue are you referring too? As far as I recall everything that is needed is included in the appropriate script install/upgrade
It's git, not the scripts. Since you need to have your git user information entered for it to work, would be good to have it added to the instructions.
I don't understand. Do you have to have a github account and be logged in to be able to download anything from github?
I can reach this without being logged in:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jarli01/xenorchestra_installer/master/xo_install.sh
No you don't have to actually have an account, it's a git requirement to put something in there though and we don't autofill that information in case someone wants to supply their account details.
choco install office365proplus is what I've always used
@Dashrender actually it would mean someone made business technical decisions.