@Dashrender
Shinobi CE is free to use for any purpose. It has to be by license.
Shinobi Pro is not.

Correct. You have to have routing to make this work.

Every router OS implements it differently.

Hell the EdgeRouter does it multiple ways if you need to.

A basic IPSEC tunnel where you simply specify the local and remote subnet, one pair per tunnel (each IPSEC connection can have more than one tunnel pair). Or a more advanced vti interface where you put in specific routes.

I would help, however having multi-server and multi-domain needs to be well thought and also have a good backup strategy. Are you also looking for integration with Mobile and Desktop clients like Exchange? Are you planning on using the Open Source or Network Edition?

@dafyre said in Designing a Potential Large SaltStack Infrastructure:

The biggest bottleneck I see would actually be bandwidth to shuffle stuff around to the remote clients...

Even with tens of thousands, not too likely.

For me, I'm doing a mysqldump of the database, then using rclone to copy the files, the mysqldump, and the /var/www/html folder over to Wasabi.

@scottalanmiller said in Pi-Hole Upstream DNS Providers:

@JaredBusch I suspect that if you put them into Custom that it prioritizes in the order that you select.

If you look in the setupVars.conf file, they are listed like this.
8098cac4-24a9-40ac-b3d2-4a3f0537f066-image.png
07fdc32c-fb20-46b7-9b15-30169dd42ee1-image.png

So you might have to edit the file instead.
But if you click the save button from the web ui, it will reset the ordering of the upstream dns servers.

@JaredBusch said in Veyon.io Cross platform computer monitoring and classroom management:

WTF is up with the use of the word "Sources"

de208aab-59a1-46dc-8b3f-718501dba163-image.png

VatesFr does this as well with Xen Orchestra.

It's dumb and makes no sense to an English speaker, as it's clearly wrong.

Just keep the content on the top, so if someone that has an issue like this, they can find an answer as well.

@JaredBusch said in FreePBX / Yealink t42s / call park configuration best practice ...:

The best use of parking is simply blind transfer via DSS key directly to a specific slot.

No one wants to waste time and a button with a park key that you then need to wait for an announcement to know where the call went.

That makes much more sense. I think I put the blinders on and focused too much on replicating the old system without thinking if there was a better way.

@black3dynamite

Files were removed, but still the same error.

[root@test~]# dnf clean all 38 files removed [root@test~]# dnf upgrade Fedora Modular 28 - x86_64 29 MB/s | 159 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 28 - x86_64 - Updates 50 MB/s | 1.5 MB 00:00 Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Updates 59 MB/s | 30 MB 00:00 Fedora 28 - x86_64 62 MB/s | 60 MB 00:00 ZeroTier, Inc. RPM Release Repository 21 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Tue 14 May 2019 03:42:02 PM UTC. Error: Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd-udev [root@test~]#

@black3dynamite said in CUPS Administration Job Info 1 Destination Mailbox:

@DustinB3403 said in CUPS Administration Job Info 1 Destination Mailbox:

While I found where OSX stores the user printer preferences, but copying a "working version of preferences" to the user workstation and directory doesn't set the preferences.

Still investigating. May require a restart when doing this remotely. . .

Full system restart or just the cups service?

Just did a full system restart and no change. While the plist file is there, and the user has owner access to it, the changes don't appear to take effect.

Not sure why.

any errors in the DNS server's logs?

I ran into a language issue the other day when writing a PowerShell script that uses net localgroup and thought it could be useful to others:

Depending on the language your Windows device is set to, the local Administrators group will be different, so the typical net localgroup administrators domain\user /add command will fail.

Implementing the following will grab the actual name of the group by it's SID first, then use that result.
Note that this is written to work in PowerShell, not CMD.exe.

# Gets the name of the local Administrators group in appropriate language $localAdminGroupName = (Get-WmiObject win32_group -filter "LocalAccount = $TRUE And SID = 'S-1-5-32-544'" | Select-Object -Expand name) Write-Output "Local Administrators group detected as: [$localAdminGroupName]" # Sets the users as a local admin using appropriate local Administrators group name net localgroup $localAdminGroupName domain\user /add # Gets local Administrators group members net localgroup $localAdminGroupName

@NashBrydges said in Leveraging Veeam Cloud Tier - Backups To Wasabi:

@wrx7m said in Leveraging Veeam Cloud Tier - Backups To Wasabi:

I upload Veeam backups to Wasabi (and before that, S3) outside of Veeam. I pull down the backups and import them back into Veeam, via the import feature.

I would like to see how well it works when everything is natively done in Veeam. If that is even possible.

How do you upload your backups to Wasabi? Are you using a 3rd party tool?

Yeah. I use a file compare tool called, BeyondCompare that runs on a windows task schedule.

@scottalanmiller these discussions echo my thoughts exactly. I'm only (hesitantly) learning Docker now, but it feels like it's not a long term answer(I'm possibly too late to the party?), as other approaches are increasing in mind-share.

@IRJ said in Massive speed increase when switching WordPress from apache to nginx:

I really wanted to do everything server side and be as lean as possible. I wanted zero plugins related to performance on my WP site.

Lean WP, that's an oxymoron if anything 🙂

I've heard before that some sites are slower with cloudflare CDN compared to going straight to the site. Are you using http/2 as well?

Most likely in this case, the switch to nginx from apache itself didn't make anything noticeably faster but the caching and compression did.

@RojoLoco said in Windows 10 Startup:

@WrCombs I don't know if I want to laugh or cry.

I've done both alternatively all day.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-48255541

Supreme Court upheld it.

@NDC said in Domain Controller DNS settings order - best practice?:

IIRC the difference is just a boot time thing. It can be slightly slower to bring the DC back online if it looks at itself for info and the DNS service isn't up yet. So if you point the first DNS entry to another machine you theoretically save a few seconds on reboot.

In theory, not something that you need if the other DNS is there 🙂