@scottalanmiller said:

There is a developer category now.

Awesome! Thanks Scott. I will make sure to try to put it to use.

@ajstringham said:

Glad you got it figured out. I was of no use on the question, or I would have helped.

I will point out that since its an ADM file instead of an ADMX file, I had to import it manually for the specific policy. ADMs don't automatically populate when in the central store. Although I did copy the ADM to the central store since it was easy to browse to when importing

It is funny that I had nothing but a good experience with ME. It worked great for me and I really hated giving it up. No, that is not sarcasam....it was stable for me.

Vista did have issues for me...namely, if I multi-selected files and then went to right click for a context menu, it could "sit there" for 2-3 minutes before giving me the menu. And it was bloated.

No we do not have permissions via our customer to share out calendars to anyone outside of their domain. I am going to work on getting that access today.

@g.jacobse said:

@ajstringham said:

@g.jacobse said:

I'm not sure how much I can offer - it's a protected sheet, we are only allowed to enter some data. But there are 4 date fields and a day calculated from that.

Start Date; Release Date; First date of month, last date of month.

Here is the formula which is in column "K":

=IF(ISBLANK(H5),"",IF(ISBLANK(G5),"Enter START DATE to calculate",IF(AND(MONTH(EOMONTH($A$2,1))>MONTH(G5),MONTH(G5)>=MONTH($A$2)),IF(ISBLANK(F5,EOMONTH($A$2,0)-G5+1,H5-G5),"START DATE MUST BE >= "&TEXT($A$2,"mm/dd/yyyy"))))

Column Fields:
e= Arrival Date
f= Release Date
g=Start date
h= end date
k=#of days formula above

Based on what I've tried,.. the formula works as long as you don't enter anything in the Release date. Once you enter the release date, the #of days drops by 1.

I'm told it works 'correctly' on one computer. I've tried two computers here one with 2010 and one with 2007 and get the same result. count is off by 1 (30 days rather than 31).

I believe the MONTH variable is 30 days. That's probably where the issue is.

I can see that being the case. However: Why would it work on one computer and not on any other.

That is true. A curious case...check for a macro of some sort maybe?

It looks like a sweet setup.

reading the About page triggers a voice in my head - is it safe / secure?

I know that question smacks of complete distrust and such, I'm not a real conspiracy nut; but i/m generally cautious of software....

@Josh said:

@josh owes all of you beers for not supporting CentOS 7 yet...

Lol

@JaredBusch said:

@garak0410 said:

Very helpful...didn't know you could turn it off. I actually got it working by deleting the cache folder (for the second time) but if I can turn it off and just save directly to my OneDrive folder on my Surface, I'll be good.

Well it is not 100% off! But, it is set to only keep 1 day of revision, and also to delete from cache when you exit the document, so basically, if you save and close daily, you should have much less problems.

Yeah, I figured that out. I had a problem with it last night, even after the above...home budget spreadsheet...spent an hour working on things...saved it...went to pull it up and it gave me some garbage about something wasn't uploaded right or corrupted in the Office Upload Center and bam, it was gone. Luckily, OneDrive website has a great version history you can restore from. Saved my rear!

@scottalanmiller said:

@JaredBusch said:

@scottalanmiller I don't use Imaging.
I guess I should break down the costs of buying the box without windows and using VL instead. probably a decently close comparison.

VL is upgrade only. It can't be used on a machine without OEM. You buy one VL license to get imaging rights so you don't need to track OEMs. Buying more VLs is for upgrades.

Exactly - Imaging rights is about the only nice/gime that MS has done with their licensing.

You buy ONE VL upgrade and you can apply imaging rights to all computers in your company with that exact same version. I.E. If you OEM licenses are all Windows 7, and you buy the VL upgrade for one of them, you can use the Windows 7 VL media to image every one of them.

There's no point in buying VL for the rest of the computers unless you plan to upgrade them to the next OS. (yeah I know this is the long winded way to say what Scott just said)

Here is the additional log info:

#systemctl status pgateway.service pgateway.service - SYSV: The Pertino Client provides access to the Pertino Network. Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/pgateway) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2014-09-02 23:33:27 EDT; 3min 48s ago Process: 21792 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/pgateway start (code=exited, status=127) Sep 02 23:33:27 to-lnx-oc1 pgateway[21792]: /etc/init.d/pgateway: line 9: /etc/init.d/functions: No such file or directory Sep 02 23:33:27 to-lnx-oc1 pgateway[21792]: /etc/init.d/pgateway: line 12: .: /etc/sysconfig/network: is a directory Sep 02 23:33:27 to-lnx-oc1 pgateway[21792]: Starting pGateway: /etc/init.d/pgateway: line 25: daemon: command not found Sep 02 23:33:27 to-lnx-oc1 systemd[1]: pgateway.service: control process exited, code=exited status=127 Sep 02 23:33:27 to-lnx-oc1 systemd[1]: Failed to start SYSV: The Pertino Client provides access to the Pertino Network.. Sep 02 23:33:27 to-lnx-oc1 systemd[1]: Unit pgateway.service entered failed state.

I was going to contact the vendor but today turned into Monday,

Ok, I was curious. I didn't think it was a current feature, but I'm glad to know it's on the roadmap. Thanks!

For site to site I prefer IPSec. OpenVPN is good but for static links I like IPSec better.

Pertino is a full mesh so you want every single device on the mesh. Very different approach.

How many devices do you have?

@scottalanmiller said:

Sure but is that the kind of stuff that you archive for permanent record?

Absolutely. That way when my wife complains about something, I have an audit trail to prove my innocence.

Even more flash back

Youtube Video

Doh...not enough coffee earlier!

For testing I'd go with the manufacture tools, but to exercise the drive and possibly help it help itself.. I'd run a level 4 scan with Spinrite.

If you don't have a XP installation media with baseline SATA drivers in it (all the newer OEM ones did) then you can't install XP on a SATA without the BIOS being in ATA mode. Native XP doesn't know about SATA drivers.

It's a bit of a hassle to make a driver slipstreamed disk, but can be done in less than an hour usually, then you can install XP on the system fairly easily and gain the performance enhancements.

@scottalanmiller said:

Matching values would be what contribute to a strong and healthy culture.

or making one worse depending on the culture.