@obsolesce said in Linux-based StarWind VSAN: hardware-agnostic, minimalistic, and FREE SDS:

@travisdh1 said in Linux-based StarWind VSAN: hardware-agnostic, minimalistic, and FREE SDS:

@obsolesce said in Linux-based StarWind VSAN: hardware-agnostic, minimalistic, and FREE SDS:

Is this tied together with VMWare? I thought this was going to be usable on Fedora, for example.

If the Starwind software is running on Linux, the hypervisor shouldn't matter. You'll be able to mount the share Starwind it's exporting on XenServer or KVM just as well, but well all the experts just in case. @KOOLER @Oksana

I'm asking because Linux and SW vSAN are worded everywhere as if it's 100% tied to VMWare, with no other use case. I can't imagine that being the case, but am asking to make sure... perhaps it's worded like that because it's written by a VMWare Architect trying to boast and sell VMWare. Just wondering, because I was under the impression you can use it how you want, not just with VMWare.

I agree with you, seems like bad marketing. I’ll be interestes in using it with KVM, for example. I thing it will just export iSCSI.

You only lose on the core licensing if you have more than 16 cores on two processors or you have 1 processor wiht less than 16 cores.

1 processor with 16 cores = 1 16 core server license
1 processor with 12 cores = 1 16 core server license
1 processor with 8 cores = 1 16 core server license
2 processors with 8 cores = 1 16 core server license
2 processors with 12 cores = 1 16 core server license + 4 2 core server license packs

Microsoft designed it around the most common system being sold. Intel Xeon dual proc 8 core systems.