ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XP and Virtual Machine Hardware Versions

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    vmware vsphereesxivirtualization
    26 Posts 6 Posters 5.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @alexntg
      last edited by

      @alexntg said:

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @alexntg we are talking about running one XP desktop here. Keep some perspective.

      It's currently a VM running in an otherwise fine server architecture. You're suggesting adding another piece of hardware and a different virtualization platform for a minor video issue.

      And a major licensing issue.

      alexntgA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • alexntgA
        alexntg @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @alexntg said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @alexntg we are talking about running one XP desktop here. Keep some perspective.

        It's currently a VM running in an otherwise fine server architecture. You're suggesting adding another piece of hardware and a different virtualization platform for a minor video issue.

        And a major licensing issue.

        All it takes is a single SA subscription or VDA license to fix. That's not major. The issue would still exist on VirtualBox.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @alexntg
          last edited by

          @alexntg Is VDA still needed on a 1:1 scenario?

          alexntgA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • alexntgA
            alexntg @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @alexntg Is VDA still needed on a 1:1 scenario?

            To start with, yes. The accessing device must be covered by either SA or VDA. If a Companion Subscription License (CSL) is added on to the VDA or SA for a user's primary device, they're able to use up to 4 additional devices to access the virtual OSE.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @alexntg
              last edited by

              @alexntg said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              @alexntg Is VDA still needed on a 1:1 scenario?

              To start with, yes. The accessing device must be covered by either SA or VDA. If a Companion Subscription License (CSL) is added on to the VDA or SA for a user's primary device, they're able to use up to 4 additional devices to access the virtual OSE.

              So you can't remote into a VM on your own desktop?

              alexntgA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • alexntgA
                alexntg @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @alexntg said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @alexntg Is VDA still needed on a 1:1 scenario?

                To start with, yes. The accessing device must be covered by either SA or VDA. If a Companion Subscription License (CSL) is added on to the VDA or SA for a user's primary device, they're able to use up to 4 additional devices to access the virtual OSE.

                So you can't remote into a VM on your own desktop?

                Without SA or VDA licensing, there's no licensed usage of a Windows desktop OS on a VM, even if on your local machine. This is the reason I have SA on my home computer.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @alexntg
                  last edited by

                  @alexntg said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @alexntg said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @alexntg Is VDA still needed on a 1:1 scenario?

                  To start with, yes. The accessing device must be covered by either SA or VDA. If a Companion Subscription License (CSL) is added on to the VDA or SA for a user's primary device, they're able to use up to 4 additional devices to access the virtual OSE.

                  So you can't remote into a VM on your own desktop?

                  Without SA or VDA licensing, there's no licensed usage of a Windows desktop OS on a VM, even if on your local machine. This is the reason I have SA on my home computer.

                  But they sell Ultimate explicitly with that option. 4 VMs on your desktop, no SA.

                  alexntgA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    technobabble
                    last edited by

                    It's like watching a tennis match. Seriously this is good information for those of us looking at keeping an XP pc alive using VM.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • alexntgA
                      alexntg @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @alexntg said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @alexntg said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @alexntg Is VDA still needed on a 1:1 scenario?

                      To start with, yes. The accessing device must be covered by either SA or VDA. If a Companion Subscription License (CSL) is added on to the VDA or SA for a user's primary device, they're able to use up to 4 additional devices to access the virtual OSE.

                      So you can't remote into a VM on your own desktop?

                      Without SA or VDA licensing, there's no licensed usage of a Windows desktop OS on a VM, even if on your local machine. This is the reason I have SA on my home computer.

                      But they sell Ultimate explicitly with that option. 4 VMs on your desktop, no SA.

                      Windows 8.1 is not available in Ultimate. It's available in RT, Basic, Pro, and Enterprise. Windows 7 Ultimate included XP mode, which was a single-instance more desktop-integrated VM designed specifically to assist with application compatibility issues. It did not include normal virtualization rights.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @alexntg
                        last edited by

                        @alexntg said:

                        Windows 8.1 is not available in Ultimate. It's available in RT, Basic, Pro, and Enterprise. Windows 7 Ultimate included XP mode, which was a single-instance more desktop-integrated VM designed specifically to assist with application compatibility issues. It did not include normal virtualization rights.

                        In the Microsoft official material it stated that Ultimate was a non-SA version of Enterprise that was identical in every way.

                        According to this chart the VDI licensing was the same between the two...

                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions

                        alexntgA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • alexntgA
                          alexntg @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @alexntg said:

                          Windows 8.1 is not available in Ultimate. It's available in RT, Basic, Pro, and Enterprise. Windows 7 Ultimate included XP mode, which was a single-instance more desktop-integrated VM designed specifically to assist with application compatibility issues. It did not include normal virtualization rights.

                          In the Microsoft official material it stated that Ultimate was a non-SA version of Enterprise that was identical in every way.

                          According to this chart the VDI licensing was the same between the two...

                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions

                          Can you link the MS official material? I'm getting my info from http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/d/4/3d42bdc2-6725-4b29-b75a-a5b04179958b/licensing_windows7_with_VM_technologies.docx

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 2 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post