ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Reluctant to recommend servers that aren't new?

    IT Discussion
    10
    43
    9.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ryan from xbyteR
      ryan from xbyte @Nara
      last edited by

      @Nara How do you handle that now? Even a 4-hour response warranty would result in a half day downtime.

      NaraN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ryan from xbyteR
        ryan from xbyte
        last edited by

        Our biggest hurdle is customers who have their servers hosted at a datacenter. The extra step of having to go to another facility makes a non-onsite warranty difficult to use.

        NaraN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          ryan, are you getting "chats"?

          ryan from xbyteR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ryan from xbyteR
            ryan from xbyte @A Former User
            last edited by

            @Hubtech I am now. I didn't know that was a chat request. I thought it was just telling me that you were online. I just received your request and will work something up. I am going over to my mother's for her birthday, so I won't be able to get you anything until tomorrow AM.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • NaraN
              Nara @ryan from xbyte
              last edited by

              @ryan-from-xbyte said:

              @Nara How do you handle that now? Even a 4-hour response warranty would result in a half day downtime.

              When possible, I get an extra server for N+1 onsite, or set up a server with a replicated copy offsite.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NaraN
                Nara @ryan from xbyte
                last edited by

                @ryan-from-xbyte said:

                Our biggest hurdle is customers who have their servers hosted at a datacenter. The extra step of having to go to another facility makes a non-onsite warranty difficult to use.

                But since the equipment's in a datacenter, the power's generally cleaner, and the environment's favorable on the servers. Wouldn't that generally result in lower failure rates? Most datacenters I've been to have workbenches to do hardware work and space for customers or remote hands to get work done while they wait for a tech.

                ryan from xbyteR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller how old of refurb PCs are you buying? or are they all factory defects that have been repaired, so not technically new, but no real age either?

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said:

                    @scottalanmiller how old of refurb PCs are you buying? or are they all factory defects that have been repaired, so not technically new, but no real age either?

                    We normally buy "off lease" so about three years old.

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @Dashrender said:

                      @scottalanmiller how old of refurb PCs are you buying? or are they all factory defects that have been repaired, so not technically new, but no real age either?

                      We normally buy "off lease" so about three years old.

                      How much longer do you run them? We did this about 4 years ago, much to my surprise most of them are still in service. They all came with XP. All of them are slated to be replaced ASAP.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller how old of refurb PCs are you buying? or are they all factory defects that have been repaired, so not technically new, but no real age either?

                        We normally buy "off lease" so about three years old.

                        How much longer do you run them? We did this about 4 years ago, much to my surprise most of them are still in service. They all came with XP. All of them are slated to be replaced ASAP.

                        Six or more years. Desktops don't age like they used to.

                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          Six or more years. Desktops don't age like they used to.

                          You run them for 6 additional years? When did you start that? Other than failure, what do you use as a measure to replace them?

                          Though I can't say much - we had desktops purchased in 1999 (Windows 98) that were upgraded to XP and the last ones were replaced in 2010.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            Six or more years. Desktops don't age like they used to.

                            You run them for 6 additional years? When did you start that? Other than failure, what do you use as a measure to replace them?

                            Though I can't say much - we had desktops purchased in 1999 (Windows 98) that were upgraded to XP and the last ones were replaced in 2010.

                            Really don't see failure. We replace the spinning rust with SSD and they run great. I'm on one of the oldest desktops in the company, maybe the oldest, and no issues at all. Runs Windows 8.1 very fast. We add memory and good graphics cards and that really makes them scream. It's not a new gaming rig or anything, but I can do pretty much anything without the slightest issues. We would only be replacing them for performance concerns and we aren't running into those yet. My desktop isn't nine years old yet but will easily be when it gets replaced.

                            ryan from xbyteR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              Until recently I was a 6 year old Q6600 with 8 gig RAM. I was/am surprised how snappy it still was (yeah I too had an SSD and did have to replace a failed video card and power supply) I still have that machine and plan to use it as a lab box - now I need more space on my desk for another monitor.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                I run dual 27" off of my old system.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ryan from xbyteR
                                  ryan from xbyte @Nara
                                  last edited by

                                  @Nara said:

                                  @ryan-from-xbyte said:

                                  Our biggest hurdle is customers who have their servers hosted at a datacenter. The extra step of having to go to another facility makes a non-onsite warranty difficult to use.

                                  But since the equipment's in a datacenter, the power's generally cleaner, and the environment's favorable on the servers. Wouldn't that generally result in lower failure rates? Most datacenters I've been to have workbenches to do hardware work and space for customers or remote hands to get work done while they wait for a tech.

                                  The issue is not the space to do the work, but having to travel to the datacenter to do the work. We offer a next business day warranty which is great for those with inhouse servers or local access to the servers, but when it can be challenging if they have to travel an hour to get to the datacenter. Some datacenters will offer remote hands, but it may be an extra charge that they have to factor in when comparing their options.

                                  We are starting to work out deals with more datacenters to include remote hands with hosting if we bring them customers. These partnerships will eliminate that issue.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • ryan from xbyteR
                                    ryan from xbyte @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller 9 years out of a desktop is amazing.

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @ryan from xbyte
                                      last edited by

                                      @ryan-from-xbyte said:

                                      @scottalanmiller 9 years out of a desktop is amazing.

                                      Not so much these days. Most people upgrade their desktops for weird reasons. I've not seen many replacements for business or performance reason, at least with IT staff. Seems to be gaming driving most updates and not work.

                                      ryan from xbyteR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ryan from xbyteR
                                        ryan from xbyte @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        @ryan-from-xbyte said:

                                        @scottalanmiller 9 years out of a desktop is amazing.

                                        Not so much these days. Most people upgrade their desktops for weird reasons. I've not seen many replacements for business or performance reason, at least with IT staff. Seems to be gaming driving most updates and not work.

                                        In the past, wouldn't the new operating systems push the need for new desktops?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          In the far past, yes. But Vista was the last Windows release with that problem and Linux never had that issues.

                                          Since Vista, every Windows release is lighter and faster than the one before. So the hardware requirements actually decrease with updates. Our boxes run better today than when purchased!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            Same goes for servers. What was acceptable for Server 2008 64bit is quite a bit better for Server 2012 R2 Core.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post