@travisdh1 said in Synology DSM 6.1 Released with Active Directory Server:

@scottalanmiller said in Synology DSM 6.1 Released with Active Directory Server:

@travisdh1 said in Synology DSM 6.1 Released with Active Directory Server:

@scottalanmiller said in Synology DSM 6.1 Released with Active Directory Server:

@travisdh1 said in Synology DSM 6.1 Released with Active Directory Server:

Hrm, fast-clone. Probably time to try out a Btrfs based file server at home.

It's good stuff.

Yeah, I know brtfs is the way to go, I just haven't tried it out yet myself. Starting out on IRIX with XFS back in the day makes me a too nostalgic.

I still use XFS for everything.

Also, should we maybe make another thread for the btrfs discussion?

I think the rule is, when in doubt, make a new thread.

@BRRABill Yes, and CALs

@scottalanmiller You do now!

Not having anything in my house that "listens" all the time....

@scottalanmiller That is true... SA does. I've done the math for my org, and it isnt worth it.

Walking around the infield at Texas Motor Speedway pre race

Does 3 Stouts a day accomplish the same thing? haha!

@scottalanmiller said:

@BRRABill said:

@JaredBusch

Right. Like that link says if you run it for a second on another machine you need a license.

Yup. Basically - don't move licensing around willy nilly. If you have to failover whole systems, you can do so (once every 90 days.) And if you want to have flexibility to do what you want, you buy DC licensing for each physical host and you are covered.

That kinda depends on how many VMs he is running... DC certainly simpler, but you can do it buying multiple Standard Server Licenses as well.

Waiting for the office to slow down so I can put in the new firewall.

I have mine on Vultr on a 1024MB 1vcpu instance. It runs fine, but I only have a handful of devices connected to it.

@scottalanmiller I would say if you get to 10vms, it is worth the extra price. For the flexibility of adding a vm whenever needed.

I'll throw my support out for the end of the week as well!

@scottalanmiller I'm a Watchguard fan. I am upgrading from an XTM26 to a M200.

It would actually be 12, if you have 13 you have to buy the licenses for 14

@DustinB3403 said:

I'm already making plans for it!

MangoCon: Just Drink IT

Better be a banner of that somewhere

Hopefully over every place you can grab a beer!

Its about time... i hate tipping

@Dashrender said:

That 12 VMs isn't just 12 on a single host for normal operations - if the plan is to move VMs around for failover, you're down to a max of 6 on each server before buying DC makes sense.

Yea, we were talking about the most that can run on a machine including all DR/Maintenance issues.

@scottalanmiller sounds fun! I may have to take a couple days vacation and stay

@scottalanmiller That would annoy me enough I would consider not answering him.